| | S | M | T | W | T | F | S | | 29 | 30 |
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
| |
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
| |
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
| |
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
| |
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
31
| 1 | 2 | » Stats |
Members: 50,144
Threads: 82,320
Posts: 853,076
Top Poster: glsammy (15,069) | | Welcome to our newest member, docotton | |  | | 
27-10-2010, 09:11 PM
| | New Member | | Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 12
| | | red bolete for ID please Evening all!
I came across these veeery well hidden specimens today amongst ceps. I've found a much bigger one which I identified some months back so I'm fairy sure I know what I'm dealing with but wanted to confirm.  
They were growing in a wood of mostly beech trees. Spotty speckled red stems (no reticulation), very dense. Stems fading to yellow with light patches. Bright yellow (then blue) when cut but has dark oxidised coating with leaves stuck to it. Smell is similiar to boletus edulis but not so strong. Cap is dark olive brown and red underneath with spores so tight I can't see any holes.
Cheers | 
27-10-2010, 09:30 PM
|  | Active Member | | Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 79
| | | Re: red bolete for ID please poss b.badius? - but then it's not often i'm right !!! mal (flaxton) is the bolete man so hopefully he'll be along soon | 
27-10-2010, 09:43 PM
| | Member of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Oct 2009 Location: Greater Manchester
Posts: 409
| | | Re: red bolete for ID please Boletus luridiformis.
ken | 
27-10-2010, 11:09 PM
|  | Commander of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Nov 2007 Location: York
Posts: 3,314
| | | Re: red bolete for ID please Quote:
Originally Posted by richickle poss b.badius? - but then it's not often i'm right !!! mal (flaxton) is the bolete man so hopefully he'll be along soon  | and Ken is just good at everything  There's never a green with envy smilie when you need one.
Mal | 
27-10-2010, 11:16 PM
|  | Knight of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: Sheffield
Posts: 8,929
| | | Re: red bolete for ID please Quote:
Originally Posted by flaxton and Ken is just good at everything  There's never a green with envy smilie when you need one.
Mal | I'm working on that icon right now mal 
John | 
27-10-2010, 11:47 PM
| | New Member | | Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 12
| | | Re: red bolete for ID please Quote:
Originally Posted by Ken Burgess Boletus luridiformis.
ken | Great, that's what I was thinking. It's a bit confusing as Rogers Mushrooms is still using the old name Boletus erythropus. Beautiful really, they are little multicoloured nuggets. Thanks Ken. | 
28-10-2010, 03:20 PM
|  | Active Member | | Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 79
| | | Re: red bolete for ID please is b.luridoformis a good find then Mal? - there are loads every year pop up on the traffic icland at the end of my in-laws street. it was the 1st one i ever found when i got into looking for fungi as a hobby | 
28-10-2010, 05:12 PM
|  | Commander of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Nov 2007 Location: York
Posts: 3,314
| | | Re: red bolete for ID please They vary, in some areas they are not common at all but in others it is difficult not to trip over them. Being a distinctive fruit-body once seen it is always easy to identify in future but I am always pleased to find it. They are also one of the early fruiters so the are often the first Bolete to appear in the summer.
Mal | 
28-10-2010, 09:48 PM
|  | Active Member | | Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 79
| | | Re: red bolete for ID please i agree mal - can't believe i got this wrong !!! we always find them at the start of august - all gone by sept. thanks - rich | 
29-10-2010, 06:08 AM
|  | Commander of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Jan 2009 Location: Jena - Germany
Posts: 1,458
| | | Re: red bolete for ID please Hello, Quote:
Originally Posted by iainbean It's a bit confusing as Rogers Mushrooms is still using the old name Boletus erythropus. | Hmmm, this depends on the sight of things ... It thinks it's confusing that the british mycologists still use the name luridiformis!
The name erythropus (in the sense of FRIES) has been used for more then one and a half century in an unanimousely sense and therefore could easily been conserved in the sense of FRIES. If the usage of the name luridiformis doesn't stop, someone has to spend a lot of time to write a proposal to conserve the name erythropus in its traditional sense. A proposal which is certainly met with, so all which use the name luridiformis will have to "re-learn" that erythropus is again the name of choice - then confirmed by the botanical congress.
Just my opinion .... - but in continental Europe there is not much other opinion in this matter, except some danish mycologists.
best regards,
Andreas
__________________ http://www.mollisia.de |  | | | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | | | | 20 members and 295 guests | | alan45, dunkeld, Flighty, frits_b, janeandphil50, JennyS, Jim Ford, Joel.W, Johnny Redgate, Johnny81, King Edward, mamatejl, Paul mabbott, Posbyonechop, Raindrop, scamps180, Sofija, solus, steve47, stevecurtis | » New Wildlife Posts | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | » New Environment Posts | | | | | | | | | » New Activity Posts | | | | | | | | | » New Community Posts | | | Spammers! Yesterday 08:00 AM 5 Replies, 101 Views | | | | | |