| | S | M | T | W | T | F | S | | 29 | 30 |
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
| |
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
| |
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
| |
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
| |
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
31
| 1 | 2 | » Stats |
Members: 50,144
Threads: 82,319
Posts: 853,069
Top Poster: glsammy (15,069) | | Welcome to our newest member, docotton | | 
06-10-2010, 06:29 PM
| | Wild Member | | Join Date: Oct 2008 Location: Harlow, Essex
Posts: 143
| | | Which Sickener is this ?? Found in mixed woodland today, there were about 8 of these fungi, all at differing stages of being eaten.
Primarily a beechwood, but also birch and coniferous trees close by.
Smelt slightly fruity to me, didn't want to taste it.
any help to ID would be appreciated, Beechwood Sickener or The Sickener ??
regards Nick | 
06-10-2010, 06:39 PM
|  | Commander of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Oct 2008 Location: Huddersfield, West Yorkshire
Posts: 3,648
| | | Re: Which Sickener is this ?? hi
I would suspect neither! Russula is generally a very difficult genus - often requiring examination of the spores (treated with iodine preparations) and cap elements (treated with sulphovanillin); plus there are a lot of them in the UK
cheers
Chris
__________________ "You must know it's right - The spore is on the wind tonight"
--Steely Dan, "Rose Darling" |  | | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | | | | 13 members and 321 guests | | Dillybythesea, dunkeld, GuyF, JennyS, Joel.W, Johnny81, johnwray205, kathyheel, mollisia, Pepsis, shenk1, Sofija, Tormentil | » New Wildlife Posts | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | » New Environment Posts | | | | | | | | | » New Activity Posts | | | | | | | | | » New Community Posts | | | Spammers! Yesterday 08:00 AM 5 Replies, 101 Views | | | | | |