| | S | M | T | W | T | F | S | | 29 | 30 |
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
| |
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
| |
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
| |
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
| |
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
31
| 1 | 2 | » Stats |
Members: 50,144
Threads: 82,319
Posts: 853,069
Top Poster: glsammy (15,069) | | Welcome to our newest member, docotton | | 
05-10-2010, 03:06 PM
|  | Commander of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Nov 2007 Location: York
Posts: 3,314
| | | Typhula May be a bit big for Chris at about .5mm but not bad all the same. Small and pink. Without the "posh" camera and bellows and macro lens (and ability  ) it is a bit difficult to get a decent photo but visible all the same.
Two for the price of one. I hadn't noticed the second species in the first photo until now.
Mal | 
05-10-2010, 04:42 PM
|  | Officer of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: May 2009 Location: Derby
Posts: 964
| | | Re: Typhula Mal
It looks very similar to the photo of T.micans from 'Mycokey'
I looked it up on the BMS databas and found there is a record from 1937 at a site I sometimes visit, not far from where I live. I will have to keep my eye open for it.
Peter
__________________ The key to understanding fungi is careful observation of macroscopic and microscopic features | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | | | | 16 members and 314 guests | | Dillybythesea, dunkeld, earthdragon64, GuyF, JennyS, Joel.W, Johnny81, johnwray205, kathyheel, mollisia, nikolai_avenger, Pepsis, Pigeon feather, shenk1, Sofija, Tormentil | » New Wildlife Posts | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | » New Environment Posts | | | | | | | | | » New Activity Posts | | | | | | | | | » New Community Posts | | | Spammers! Yesterday 08:00 AM 5 Replies, 101 Views | | | | | |