| | S | M | T | W | T | F | S | | 29 | 30 |
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
| |
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
| |
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
| |
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
| |
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
31
| 1 | 2 | » Stats |
Members: 50,142
Threads: 82,310
Posts: 853,028
Top Poster: glsammy (15,069) | | Welcome to our newest member, Posbyonechop | |  | 
20-08-2010, 07:42 PM
|  | Wild Member | | Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 135
| | | Unknown Fungi | 
21-08-2010, 07:12 AM
|  | Knight Commander of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Sep 2006 Location: East Harling, Norfolk
Posts: 8,965
| | | Re: Unknown Fungi The only one of your 4 photographs that has enough relevant information for a vague ID is the first- luckily, it's Coprinus micaceus, which is easily identifiable by its cap. Unfortunately, the other three lack the information needed to even come close to ID!
P.S- didn't mean that last bit to come across nasty! It's a photographic learning process as well as mycological | 
21-08-2010, 10:20 AM
|  | Commander of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Oct 2008 Location: Huddersfield, West Yorkshire
Posts: 3,648
| | | Re: Unknown Fungi Quote:
Originally Posted by NickCantle The only one of your 4 photographs that has enough relevant information for a vague ID is the first- luckily, it's Coprinus micaceus, which is easily identifiable by its cap. | really? how could you possibly eliminate Coprinellus truncorum on the evidence here? there may well be others - old C. ellisii for example Coprinellus micaceus is "easily identifiable" by reference to its veil and - chiefly - spore shape; I suspect that it may be one of the most misidentified agarics we have, when ID'd merely on macro appearance; thankfully it's common, so no real harm is done . . . .
Chris
__________________ "You must know it's right - The spore is on the wind tonight"
--Steely Dan, "Rose Darling" | 
21-08-2010, 11:09 AM
|  | Knight Commander of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Sep 2006 Location: East Harling, Norfolk
Posts: 8,965
| | | Re: Unknown Fungi Well you've obviously overlooked the fact that I may have sent my mycological fairies over to check...  I see what you mean, t'was a bad assumption   Ta Chris, will be more careful with those in future! |  | | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | | » New Wildlife Posts | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | » New Environment Posts | | | | | | | | | » New Activity Posts | | | | | | | | | » New Community Posts | | | | | | | | | |