I've decided to do a new thread to include the other interesting
Coprinus species I found the other day as well as
Coprinellus angulatus. It's looking to be a very interesting site for the '
Coprinus' genera.
As promised, the macro photo of
Coprinellus angulatus:

Growing in wood ash

with the distinctive spores.
Also growing on a burnt willow stump in the middle of ash pile was a small
Coprinopsis echinosporus, which also has very distinctive spores, warty with a waist just above the very large and prominent pore.
Then just a bit further along, close to where I've found a few
Coprinellus flocullosus, was another interesting find - I'm pretty sure this is
Coprinellus subimpatiens, but would like confirmation/other suggestions.
It has a hymeniderm cap, with long pileicystidia:

Hymeniderm at 10x

Pileicystidia
The cheilocystidia are both globose and lageniform, which separates it from
C callinus which only has globose cheilocystidia, or just a very few lageniform.
Spores (10.9) 11.2 - 12.7 (13.4) x (5.8) 6.3-6.9 (7.4)um Qav 1.8. This size could fit either
C subimpatiens or
C callinus
Basidia 4 spored
There were also a lot of
Parasola around. Turned out there were not just one species but three

. I've learnt to not assume they are all
Parasola plicatilis, so they go straight under the microscope. In fact amongst these were the first
P plicatilis I've ever found ...
The first was right in the middle of a muddy path, in bare soil, under ash and sycamore. It did look a bit different to the usual
Parasola, slightly redder, and not in the usual grassland habitat. The small spores and habitat place it as
Parasola kuehneri.

Spore size (9.7) 10.0-10.9 (11.3) x (6.7) 6.9-7.5 (7.7) x (5.7) 5.8-6.6 (6.9).
Average 10.4x 7.2 Qav 1.4
These are a bit larger than the quoted size, but fit better
P kuehneri than
P plicatilis, and when put side by side with those of
P plicatilis at the same magnification, same set up, clearly smaller.
Then there was also
P schroeteri, with very fat heart-shaped spores. I couldn't tell in the field
P schroeteri and
P plicatilis apart, or at my desk either. But being over zealous I decided to look at both under the microscope expecting them to be the same, only to discover that they weren't. Both were in a grassy area.
Parasola schroeteri spores
(10.2) 11.0-12.1 (12.3) x (9.0) 10.0-11.0 (11.3) um
Average 11.6x 10.5 Qav 1.1
Parasola plicatilis spores
(10.4) 11.0-12.7 (14.1) x (8.5) 8.8-10.1 (11.1) um
Average 11.8 xx 9.4um, Qav 1.3
I've put all three one above the other to compare directly -

Top
P kuehneri, Middle
P plicatilis, Bottom
P schroeteri
I'll put the other non
Coprinus on a following post as this might be getting close to the picture limit.
Melanie