| | S | M | T | W | T | F | S | | 29 | 30 |
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
| |
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
| |
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
| |
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
| |
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
31
| 1 | 2 | » Stats |
Members: 50,142
Threads: 82,311
Posts: 853,029
Top Poster: glsammy (15,069) | | Welcome to our newest member, Posbyonechop | |  | 
12-02-2010, 12:24 AM
|  | New Member | | Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 2
| | Unidentified fungus found on dead Oak, Unknown Antrodia species Hello,
I've joined this forum tonight to try and get this mushroom identified: Unidentified Antrodia fungi - Wild About Britain Pics
It's growing on a dead oak in an Exmoor woodland on a West slope at about 100m.
There are about 4 fruiting bodies NW to SW on the trunk (none on the north side) The largest measuring about 15cm wide.
Look forward to your suggestions!
Warmest wishes,
hen
stockwood.heartandsoil.org | 
12-02-2010, 09:29 AM
|  | Commander of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Feb 2008 Location: Newbury, Berkshire
Posts: 1,777
| | | Re: Unidentified fungus found on dead Oak, Unknown Antrodia species Welcome to WAB,
Your specimen looks like Phellinus ferreus, looking quite unlike many book examples as it is on a near vertical surface.
Cheers J.P. | 
12-02-2010, 09:40 AM
|  | Commander of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Aug 2008 Location: Saddleworth
Posts: 4,134
| | | Re: Unidentified fungus found on dead Oak, Unknown Antrodia species Welcome to WAB hen!
Cant help you though, I did make a bid via the web and found 98 Antrodia species entries!
Antrodia /datronia mollis can be brownish on top, so maybe?
It looks quite a tired old specimen, maybe revisit during the year?
Sorry
Cheers
Ken
__________________ Sensible Mole, said Ratty, perceiving Old Burton Beer..... | 
12-02-2010, 11:14 AM
| | Commander of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 4,261
| | | Re: Unidentified fungus found on dead Oak, Unknown Antrodia species Hello Hen,
A big Hi to you from moi, I can well understand why Antrodia came into your head (and mine !) as the form is absolutely right, the problem though is most Antrodia spp. occur on conifers in Britain, and of the few that can be found on deciduous trees, only a couple ( Antrodia albida and A. vaillantii) are known from Quercus.
Therefore, I suspect JP is correct with his suggestion of Phellinus ferreus or maybe something similar, as colour is correct, Quercus would be right (esp' dead) and the change of 'form' due to growing vertical, is a sound prognosis.
(Cor blimey, that sounds posh, I ain't really !)
Neil. | 
12-02-2010, 03:19 PM
|  | New Member | | Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 2
| | | Re: Unidentified fungus found on dead Oak, Unknown Antrodia species Thank you for your great suggestions!
I passed them on to the Woodland Trust officer that showed an interest in the funghus originally. He responded saying that if it was a Phellinus ferreus that old, it would have completely destroyed the timber underneath.
Here's a new photograph from a different angle which sort of shows what the timber looks like:
I'll get some better pics of the timber this weekend.
Thanks again! 
hen | 
12-02-2010, 07:02 PM
|  | Commander of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Jan 2009 Location: Jena - Germany
Posts: 1,458
| | | Re: Unidentified fungus found on dead Oak, Unknown Antrodia species Hello,
I also think that only Phellinus is possible. At least the genus should be easily to clarify microscopically. Besides Ph. ferreus (that I have never seen) may be Ph. ferruginosus is also a possibility?
best regards,
Andreas
__________________ http://www.mollisia.de | 
12-02-2010, 08:48 PM
| | Commander of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 4,261
| | | Re: Unidentified fungus found on dead Oak, Unknown Antrodia species Looking at your new photo tells me it will be standing for a few more years to come as it has grown some feet or boots to support it or is that a shy Woodland Trust officer ?
Anyway, Andreas all the way from Jena in Germany agrees this is Phellinus, but it is uncertain if it is P.ferreus or P.ferruginosus.
Sometimes it is possible to seperate the two by the size of the pores, but to be certain you need to measure the spore size.
Neil. |  | | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | | » New Wildlife Posts | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | » New Environment Posts | | | | | | | | | » New Activity Posts | | | | | | | | | » New Community Posts | | | Spammers! Yesterday 08:00 AM 5 Replies, 99 Views | | | | | |