| | S | M | T | W | T | F | S | | 29 | 30 |
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
| |
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
| |
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
| |
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
| |
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
31
| 1 | 2 |  » Stats |
Members: 50,142
Threads: 82,312
Posts: 853,033
Top Poster: glsammy (15,069)
| | Welcome to our newest member, Posbyonechop | |  | 
08-10-2009, 07:10 PM
| | Wild Member | | Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 240
| | | ID help please
Found these this evening on pine forest floor but struggling to ID.   
Any help appreciated
thanks
Jon |
08-10-2009, 07:24 PM
| | Wild Member | | Join Date: Oct 2008 Location: east midlands
Posts: 169
| | | Re: ID help please
Collybia peronata or maculata ??
J. |
08-10-2009, 07:48 PM
| | Wild Member | | Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 240
| | | Re: ID help please
thanks for that hint. I've found it now. Page 121 of my "Phillips". I'm going for Maculata.
Jon |
08-10-2009, 08:01 PM
| | Wild Member | | Join Date: Oct 2008 Location: east midlands
Posts: 169
| | | Re: ID help please
Quote:
Originally Posted by jonbem  thanks for that hint. I've found it now. Page 121 of my "Phillips". I'm going for Maculata.
Jon | Hi, i have been finding lots of both peronata and maculata over the last two weeks, which were very dry and unlike the usual colours they show when it has been damp, since we got a nice bit of rain i have found a few in their more usual appearance, yours look like the dryer specimens i have been finding recently, hard to tell from your pics, but they look very much like the C.peronata i have been finding among conifers,
j. |
08-10-2009, 10:03 PM
|  | Commander of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Nov 2007 Location: York
Posts: 3,314
| | | Re: ID help please
Jon
I would certainly go for maculata rather than peronata. More crowded cream gills more solid stipe no sign of the hairy foot all point in that direction.
Mal |
09-10-2009, 07:05 AM
| | Wild Member | | Join Date: Oct 2008 Location: east midlands
Posts: 169
| | | Re: ID help please
Quote:
Originally Posted by flaxton Jon
I would certainly go for maculata rather than peronata. More crowded cream gills more solid stipe no sign of the hairy foot all point in that direction.
Mal | Having had a closer look at the photos, i think you are probably right with maculata, the gills dont have that yellow/ochre look to them at all, as for the wooly foot, i find that in dryer conditions these have not been as pronounced as would be usual, but all in all maculata does seem a better fit
j. | | |
| Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes |  Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
| | |
| » New Wildlife Posts | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | » New Environment Posts | | | | | | | | | » New Activity Posts | | | | | | | | | » New Community Posts | | |  Spammers! Yesterday 08:00 AM 5 Replies, 99 Views | | | | | |
