| | S | M | T | W | T | F | S | | 29 | 30 |
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
| |
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
| |
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
| |
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
| |
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
31
| 1 | 2 | » Stats |
Members: 50,139
Threads: 82,302
Posts: 852,994
Top Poster: glsammy (15,069) | | Welcome to our newest member, jo0ls | |  | 
26-08-2009, 07:10 PM
|  | Officer of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Sep 2006 Location: Dinnington, S Yorks
Posts: 812
| | | Unknown Fungus for ID please Cuckney Hay Wood 2 Aug 2009
Found growing in path on part buried wood in coniferous woodland.
There appears to be only a rudimentary gill shape.
Comments or suggestions as to an ID are welcomed.
Les
__________________ Leave only footprints, take only pictures | 
26-08-2009, 07:35 PM
| | Commander of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Nov 2008 Location: Near Scarborough
Posts: 2,077
| | | Re: Unknown Fungus for ID please I'm wondering if have they been got by another fungus, and the reason why the gills are not properly developed or part obliterated? The close up looks a bit like that ... | 
26-08-2009, 11:44 PM
| | Commander of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 4,261
| | | Re: Unknown Fungus for ID please Sterile Lyophyllum leucophaeatum perhaps, this bruises blue, finally turning black. | 
26-08-2009, 11:45 PM
|  | Knight Commander of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Sep 2006 Location: East Harling, Norfolk
Posts: 8,965
| | | Re: Unknown Fungus for ID please Quote:
Originally Posted by fairplay Sterile Lyophyllum leucophaeatum perhaps, this bruises blue, finally turning black. | Couldn't resist could you | 
26-08-2009, 11:48 PM
| | Commander of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 4,261
| | | Re: Unknown Fungus for ID please | 
26-08-2009, 11:51 PM
|  | Commander of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Oct 2008 Location: Huddersfield, West Yorkshire
Posts: 3,648
| | | Re: Unknown Fungus for ID please hi Les
it's a bit difficult to gauge the scale - but I am guessing these are on the small side?
I think this fungus could be Cudoniella acicularis, and that the reason the gills haven't developed is because this isn't a gilled fungus
remember the vast majority of fungi don't have gills - so their absence isn't necessarily caused by a problem
that said, pace Melanie, there does seem to be something interesting happening on some of the fruit-bodies; if you have material Les, PM me - I'm always happy to look at the more unusual stuff - especially if from my stamping grounds of years ago!
cheers
Chris PS - though I've never heard of Cuckney Hay Wood  - just checked (tsk tsk - not Yorkshire  )
__________________ "You must know it's right - The spore is on the wind tonight"
--Steely Dan, "Rose Darling"
Last edited by Chris Yeates; 26-08-2009 at 11:55 PM.
| 
27-08-2009, 09:21 AM
| | Wild Member | | Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 226
| | | Re: Unknown Fungus for ID please As Chris says, it is difficult to judge the size of these, but my feeling is that they may be too large for Cudoniella acicularis, judging by the surrounding mosses and conifer debris.
If they were in the order of 2-4cm high they could be something much more unsusual - Cudonia confusa. But more information would be needed to be sure whether this is even an option. | 
27-08-2009, 12:14 PM
|  | Officer of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Sep 2006 Location: Dinnington, S Yorks
Posts: 812
| | | Re: Unknown Fungus for ID please They were indeed small. I'd say in the order of 1cm high. It was the quantity of fruit bodies that atracted my attention, and it took a hand lens to establish that they were indeed fungal.
Sorry Chris, no sample collected. My good friend FJ was absent on this trip, and he is the collector of samples. I do occassional stray across the border, Chris.
Thanks for all your comments. It is so good to have old friends returning, too.
Les
__________________ Leave only footprints, take only pictures | 
27-08-2009, 12:55 PM
| | Wild Member | | Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 226
| | | Re: Unknown Fungus for ID please Quote:
Originally Posted by Nettle Runner They were indeed small. I'd say in the order of 1cm high. | Which is at the upper end of the size range for Cudoniella acicularis so Chris is probably spot on. |  | | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | | | | 38 members and 393 guests | | Ace, AlanJenkins, Bruce Williams, Canon 4 Ade, Cogs, daboos, DaiTheDragon, david156, Deb London, Dillybythesea, Dorts, Douglas, Epidacty, Farplace, GTH, Hedera, Hedgehoggy, Kenneth Baldwin, King Edward, leon_heller, Malkie, marvin, Mattj68, mbaldw, MegaCindy, MP, pammosley, Pigeon feather, PMG, pressld2, RobinP, Sofija, stevecurtis, sunnydale, tjhavenith, welsh.lensman, Za, ~T~ | » New Wildlife Posts | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | » New Environment Posts | | | | | | | | | » New Activity Posts | | | | | | | | | » New Community Posts | | | | | | | | | |