| | S | M | T | W | T | F | S | | 29 | 30 |
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
| |
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
| |
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
| |
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
| |
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
31
| 1 | 2 | » Stats |
Members: 50,139
Threads: 82,301
Posts: 852,991
Top Poster: glsammy (15,069) | | Welcome to our newest member, jo0ls | |  | 
17-08-2009, 09:01 PM
|  | New Member | | Join Date: Jul 2009 Location: surrey
Posts: 18
| | | help with ID Please | 
17-08-2009, 09:12 PM
|  | Commander of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Jan 2009 Location: Jena - Germany
Posts: 1,458
| | | Re: help with ID Please Hello,
the Birch Bolet is o.k., but the Russula not. The colours don't fit for R. atropurpurea, which never has pure red coloures. I think this one is Russula pseudointegra. If you hav a microscope it is easyly identified by it cystidia with encrusting surrounding.
no. 3 is Cortinarius torvus. No other Cortinarius has such a ring
no.4 is Russula delica
no. 5 is Xerula radicata.
best regards,
Andreas
__________________ http://www.mollisia.de | 
17-08-2009, 09:52 PM
| | Wild Member | | Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 226
| | | Re: help with ID Please Quote:
Originally Posted by mollisia The colours don't fit for R. atropurpurea, which never has pure red coloures. I think this one is Russula pseudointegra. | Russula nobilis was actually suggested (better known as Russula mairei), which would have pure red colours. However, a quick taste of the flesh would have ruled this in or out. It would be very hot to taste. Somehow it doesn't look quite right for this species.
Having just worked on Russula pseudointegra today, I'd agree with Andreas that this seems a good bet, but wouldn't be certain without more info. | 
18-08-2009, 08:05 PM
|  | New Member | | Join Date: Jul 2009 Location: surrey
Posts: 18
| | | Re: help with ID Please Thanks for help always very much appreciated.
Mark | 
18-08-2009, 08:43 PM
|  | Commander of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Jan 2009 Location: Jena - Germany
Posts: 1,458
| | | Re: help with ID Please Hello,
sorry for mixing up Russula nobilis with R. atropurpurea. It is of course another name for R. mairei .....
R. mairei would suite, but I still think that R. pseudointegra suites better. The younger fruitbodies of this species have a quite peculiar feature: The cap margin is conspicousely pruinose, with a white, nearly granular pruine that is very typical for this species only. I marked these places with an arrow in the picture below. Also the gills don't seem to be white.
If one could do a microscopic examination, it would be clear in half a minute if it is pseudointegra or not.
best regards,
Andreas
__________________ http://www.mollisia.de |  | | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | | | | 38 members and 390 guests | | Ace, Alan Hewitt, alanc15, Bruce Williams, Cogs, DaiTheDragon, david156, Deb London, digey12, Dillybythesea, Dorts, Douglas, Epidacty, Farplace, GTH, Hedera, Kenneth Baldwin, King Edward, Malkie, marvin, Mattj68, mbaldw, MegaCindy, MP, Normski4ash, pammosley, Pigeon feather, pressld2, Robert S J Smith, RobinP, rogpow, Sofija, stevecurtis, sunnydale, tjhavenith, welsh.lensman, Za, ~T~ | » New Wildlife Posts | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | » New Environment Posts | | | | | | | | | » New Activity Posts | | | | | | | | | » New Community Posts | | | | | | | | | |