| | S | M | T | W | T | F | S | | 29 | 30 |
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
| |
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
| |
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
| |
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
| |
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
31
| 1 | 2 | » Stats |
Members: 50,139
Threads: 82,301
Posts: 852,991
Top Poster: glsammy (15,069) | | Welcome to our newest member, jo0ls | |  | | 
16-08-2009, 08:55 PM
|  | Knight Commander of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: Red Rose County
Posts: 5,205
| | | Is This Dyer's Mazegill? Found today on a fallen & well rotting Larch trunk, are these Dyer's Mazegill - Phaeolus schweintzii?
Any confirmation/other much appreciated.
Regards
Mike. | 
17-08-2009, 12:59 PM
|  | Knight Commander of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: Red Rose County
Posts: 5,205
| | | Re: Is This Dyer's Mazegill? No takers on this one?
I would like to get an ID if at all possible - It does seem to resemble Phaeolus schweintzii in some of my books, and on some of the images I've found online.
However, it is sufficiently different in looks to leave me with reservations - but yet it is a very distinctive looking fungus. | 
17-08-2009, 01:29 PM
|  | Commander of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: Yateley, Hampshire
Posts: 3,231
| | | Re: Is This Dyer's Mazegill? I find this in various locations in this vicinity on stumps and roots of conifers and I would say you're on a safe bet Mike. Tomentose when young, often with concentic orange zones and a dark to red-brown centre. The marginal zone of the more mature specimen is sufficiently sulphur yellow and the labarinthe-like pore surface pattern, bruising brown, matches the plate in FOS.
David
Last edited by cybershot; 17-08-2009 at 01:33 PM.
| 
17-08-2009, 01:32 PM
|  | Knight Commander of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: Red Rose County
Posts: 5,205
| | | Re: Is This Dyer's Mazegill? Thanks David. - It was one of those where I was convinced when I took the photo, but then when I got home and started looking at other photos, I became more & more uncertain of whether I was correct.
Regards,
Mike. | 
30-08-2009, 07:18 PM
|  | Member of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Aug 2009 Location: herts
Posts: 332
| | | Re: Is This Dyer's Mazegill? This is Pheaolus, but dyers mazegill is the conifer maze gill, phealous is pores not maze gilled, I think there is much miss information in the txt books!
Ive been hunting dyers maze gill for a decade!
this is a loveley example of the Phaeolus . | 
30-08-2009, 07:34 PM
|  | Commander of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: Yateley, Hampshire
Posts: 3,231
| | | Re: Is This Dyer's Mazegill? I think you'll find that Gloeophyllum sepiarium is designated Conifer Mazegill according to the BMS List of Recommended English Names of Fungi in the UK | 
30-08-2009, 07:38 PM
|  | Commander of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Oct 2008 Location: Huddersfield, West Yorkshire
Posts: 3,648
| | | Re: Is This Dyer's Mazegill? Quote:
Originally Posted by cybershot I think you'll find that Gloeophyllum sepiarium is designated Conifer Mazegill according to the BMS List of Recommended English Names of Fungi in the UK | I could start on one of my tirades about English names being more trouble than they are worth here - but I won't . . .
. . . . oh! I have 
C
__________________ "You must know it's right - The spore is on the wind tonight"
--Steely Dan, "Rose Darling" | 
30-08-2009, 07:45 PM
|  | Commander of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: Yateley, Hampshire
Posts: 3,231
| | | Re: Is This Dyer's Mazegill? Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris Yeates I could start on one of my tirades about English names being more trouble than they are worth here - but I won't . . .
. . . . oh! I have 
C | That's why it generally safer to stick to the Latin Names to avoid confusion, other than the on going shift in taxonomy, but our new friend seems to focus on the Common Names | 
30-08-2009, 09:44 PM
|  | Knight Commander of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Sep 2006 Location: East Harling, Norfolk
Posts: 8,965
| | | Re: Is This Dyer's Mazegill? Quote:
Originally Posted by hamadryad This is Pheaolus, but dyers mazegill is the conifer maze gill, phealous is pores not maze gilled, I think there is much miss information in the txt books!. | Where did you find this information may I ask? I've just done a quick search on t'web and multiple reliable sources state that Dyer's Mazegill is in fact the common name for Phaeolus schweintzii. | 
30-08-2009, 09:49 PM
|  | Commander of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: North Yorkshire
Posts: 2,982
| | | Re: Is This Dyer's Mazegill? Quote:
Originally Posted by NickCantle Where did you find this information may I ask? I've just done a quick search on t'web and multiple reliable sources state that Dyer's Mazegill is in fact the common name for Phaeolus schweintzii. | Thank you all the people who spent their time making up common names for things that didn't have them. You have made life so much more simple.   
__________________ Genio Terræ Britannicæ |  | | | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | | | | 36 members and 395 guests | | Ace, Alan Hewitt, alanc15, Cogs, DaiTheDragon, david156, Deb London, digey12, Dillybythesea, Dorts, Douglas, Farplace, GTH, Hedera, Jersali, Jonners, Kenneth Baldwin, Malkie, Mattj68, mbaldw, MegaCindy, MP, Normski4ash, pammosley, Pigeon feather, pressld2, Robert S J Smith, RobinP, rogpow, Sofija, stevecurtis, sunnydale, tjhavenith, welsh.lensman, Za, ~T~ | » New Wildlife Posts | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | » New Environment Posts | | | | | | | | | » New Activity Posts | | | | | | | | | » New Community Posts | | | | | | | | | |