| | S | M | T | W | T | F | S | | 29 | 30 |
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
| |
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
| |
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
| |
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
| |
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
31
| 1 | 2 | » Stats |
Members: 50,139
Threads: 82,301
Posts: 852,986
Top Poster: glsammy (15,069) | | Welcome to our newest member, jo0ls | |  | | 
13-08-2009, 11:55 PM
| | New Member | | Join Date: Oct 2008 Location: Carmarthenshire, Wales
Posts: 23
| | | Re: Boletus ID Please Thanks again for all your help.
Am I correct in assuming that this is 'potentially' a rare fungus? Unfortunately I did not keep the specimen - a lesson learned!!! For future reference (in case I find another), Andreas suggested sending a dried specimen to Kew - how would one go about this? Sorry I can't join the 'technical' debate, this is well out of my depth - I still have a lot to learn.
Here are some additional pictures I took of the cross section. Again not great, as taken with a mobile phone at my work desk.
Cheers
Charlie | 
14-08-2009, 05:58 AM
|  | Commander of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Jan 2009 Location: Jena - Germany
Posts: 1,458
| | | Re: Boletus ID Please Hello,
the additional pictures show some important features.
First the true cap colour can be seen on the first (dark) picture. It is a deep red. Second the blueing isn't that strong inside as on the tubes and on the stipe surface. Therefor X. cisalpinus can be excluded. That secies would blue also in the flesh and reminds of Boletus pulverulentus (but slower and not that intense). And third there might be some ornage spots in the base of the stipe, but that isn't clearly visible. May be it's just the wish to see them 
So I would wonder if this is X. ripariellus, but think it's just "only" X. rubellus. To clarify whether it is rubellus or the rarely observed ripariellus, one has to look at the spores microscopically. X. rubellus has quite stout spores, which are smooth even in REM, X. ripariellus has more elongate spores which have ridges (which are often only seen in REM ).
The biotop would be more typical for X. rubellus, which often occures in parkland.
If you come across another specimen best is to cut it in half and then dry it with low heat but some air movement. A radiator is perfect, the good old TV monitor is also perfect. An oven is not recommended, but is possible if you heat with smallest heat (< 50°), leave the door open and put the specimen to dry on the open door and not inside the oven. Quite a waste of energy though .... 
Before you dry it it would be nice to have a foto from the flesh of the stipe base, as sharp and as near as possible. If it is X. rubellus, one should see the orange dots with some luck. But sometimes they are so few and small that one needs a lens to see it.
best regards,
Andreas
__________________ http://www.mollisia.de | 
14-08-2009, 09:27 AM
|  | Commander of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Nov 2007 Location: York
Posts: 3,314
| | | Re: Boletus ID Please These photos certainly "help" with the identification. Externally this looks like X reparieluis but the bluing shows this to be almost certainly X rubellus (repariellus would normally turn blue in the lower half of the stipe as well as the cap)
Mal |  | | | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | | | | 32 members and 402 guests | | Ace, Alan Hewitt, alanc15, david156, Deb London, digey12, Dorts, earthgraham, Farplace, Jersali, Johnny Redgate, Jonners, Kate_Izzy, Kenneth Baldwin, Malkie, Mattj68, mbaldw, MegaCindy, MP, Normski4ash, operanut1972, pammosley, Pigeon feather, pressld2, Robert S J Smith, rogpow, Sofija, sunnydale, tjhavenith, welsh.lensman, Za, ~T~ | » New Wildlife Posts | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | » New Environment Posts | | | | | | | | | » New Activity Posts | | | | | | | | | » New Community Posts | | | | | | | | | |