| | S | M | T | W | T | F | S | | 29 | 30 |
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
| |
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
| |
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
| |
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
| |
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
31
| 1 | 2 | » Stats |
Members: 50,141
Threads: 82,304
Posts: 852,999
Top Poster: glsammy (15,069) | | Welcome to our newest member, nippynorman | |  | 
19-07-2009, 10:13 AM
|  | Officer of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Nov 2007 Location: East Yorkshire
Posts: 691
| | | Possible Hygrophorous Summers here and at last I`m picking up one or two interesting looking fungi!
I have limited time due to other commitments but I like to think I`m making progress with mushrooms. I classify fungi broadly as; 1. Identifiable by me (a small category), 2. Identifiable with assistance (a large category but hopefully shrinking) and 3. Un-identifiable even with assistance (an incredibly large category). In order to use my time as efficiently as possible and not waste other peoples time, I tend to ignore category 3 and to concentrate on category 2.
However; heres one from this weekend I would like help with if possible. A small white agaric, white stem, white well spaced gills, (which I think are slightly decurrent). It was growing in a meadow, grazed regularly by cattle, not far from a hawthorn hedge. The nearest I can get is Hygrophorous but I`m not confident, anyone got any ideas?
Cheers
Pete | 
19-07-2009, 11:25 AM
|  | Officer of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: worksop north notts
Posts: 839
| | | Re: Possible Hygrophorous Quote:
Originally Posted by watsthat Summers here and at last I`m picking up one or two interesting looking fungi!
I have limited time due to other commitments but I like to think I`m making progress with mushrooms. I classify fungi broadly as; 1. Identifiable by me (a small category), 2. Identifiable with assistance (a large category but hopefully shrinking) and 3. Un-identifiable even with assistance (an incredibly large category). In order to use my time as efficiently as possible and not waste other peoples time, I tend to ignore category 3 and to concentrate on category 2.
However; heres one from this weekend I would like help with if possible. A small white agaric, white stem, white well spaced gills, (which I think are slightly decurrent). It was growing in a meadow, grazed regularly by cattle, not far from a hawthorn hedge. The nearest I can get is Hygrophorous but I`m not confident, anyone got any ideas?
Cheers
Pete  |
probably way off the mark, but it has the look of an Agrocybe sp to me,
you need Chris and Melanie on the case with this one
Brian. | 
19-07-2009, 11:41 AM
|  | Commander of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Oct 2008 Location: Huddersfield, West Yorkshire
Posts: 3,648
| | | Re: Possible Hygrophorous hi
definitely not a Hygrophorus sensu stricto;or indeed one of the genera formerly included under the name - like Hygrocybe and Camarophyllus - because it clearly has a veil, and those last two don't
as to what it is I have less comment to make  ; there appears to be a pinkish brown (spore?) deposit on one part of the velar remants though . . .
among the many useful comments I carry with me from participation on BMS forays is one which went "one fungus is not a fungus" * meaning of course that you really need several specimens, preferably at different stages of development; it also allows at least one of the specimens to be effectively destroyed as the poor thing undergoes getting a spore print, scalping, sectioning, staining, squashing and the like  , while allowing for others to be dried for the herbarium if they prove to be something unusual or worth sending to an expert
I would like to see a spore print (and indeed spores - he said, asking the impossible!) before going much further; there may be people who are able to name this from what we can see here, but I'm afraid I'm not one of them - despite Brian's ill-placed confidence * and yes, I fully appreciate that far too often a single fruitbody is what we are presented with!
cheers
Chris
__________________ "You must know it's right - The spore is on the wind tonight"
--Steely Dan, "Rose Darling"
Last edited by Chris Yeates; 19-07-2009 at 11:56 AM.
| 
19-07-2009, 01:10 PM
|  | Officer of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Nov 2007 Location: East Yorkshire
Posts: 691
| | | Re: Possible Hygrophorous Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris Yeates hi
definitely not a Hygrophorus sensu stricto;or indeed one of the genera formerly included under the name - like Hygrocybe and Camarophyllus - because it clearly has a veil, and those last two don't
as to what it is I have less comment to make  ; there appears to be a pinkish brown (spore?) deposit on one part of the velar remants though . . .
among the many useful comments I carry with me from participation on BMS forays is one which went "one fungus is not a fungus" * meaning of course that you really need several specimens, preferably at different stages of development; it also allows at least one of the specimens to be effectively destroyed as the poor thing undergoes getting a spore print, scalping, sectioning, staining, squashing and the like  , while allowing for others to be dried for the herbarium if they prove to be something unusual or worth sending to an expert
I would like to see a spore print (and indeed spores - he said, asking the impossible!) before going much further; there may be people who are able to name this from what we can see here, but I'm afraid I'm not one of them - despite Brian's ill-placed confidence * and yes, I fully appreciate that far too often a single fruitbody is what we are presented with!
cheers
Chris | Thanks Chris, its looking like a Cat 3 then
Pete | 
20-07-2009, 12:27 AM
| | Commander of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Nov 2008 Location: Near Scarborough
Posts: 2,077
| | | Re: Possible Hygrophorous Quote:
Originally Posted by kiltoncomp probably way off the mark, but it has the look of an Agrocybe sp to me,
you need Chris and Melanie on the case with this one
Brian. | It looks very thin fleshed to me, translucent and very delicate, though it may be just a trick of the light. The Agrocybes I have been finding in the last few days are quite robust and the flesh opaque.
Melanie
Actually it is rather like the moth that has turned up as a link ....
Last edited by SheffieldLass; 20-07-2009 at 12:30 AM.
| 
20-07-2009, 09:11 AM
|  | Wild Member | | Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: Yorkshire
Posts: 116
| | | Re: Possible Hygrophorous How about a volvariella that lost its volva ? (and daren't tell its mum....) Did it smell of anything? There are some white tricholomas that look a bit like this in pictures - he said making himself sound even sillier than usual - but the apparently pinkish spores or gills??? Is the stipe hollow? These and other questions .....
Cheers, (back from Guyana) Alan
Last edited by Alantb; 20-07-2009 at 09:27 AM.
Reason: spelling
| 
20-07-2009, 10:22 AM
|  | Knight of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: Sheffield
Posts: 8,929
| | | Re: Possible Hygrophorous It does look very fragile and washed out. The hanging partial veil remnants on the margins may possibly suggest Psathyrella ... candolleana maybe.
One for over the shoulder
John | 
20-07-2009, 04:51 PM
|  | Commander of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Jan 2009 Location: Jena - Germany
Posts: 1,458
| | | Re: Possible Hygrophorous Hello, Quote:
Originally Posted by FungiJohn It does look very fragile and washed out. The hanging partial veil remnants on the margins may possibly suggest Psathyrella ... candolleana maybe. | I second that! Quote:
One for over the shoulder | That too!
best regards,
Andreas
__________________ http://www.mollisia.de | 
20-07-2009, 08:42 PM
|  | Officer of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Nov 2007 Location: East Yorkshire
Posts: 691
| | | Re: Possible Hygrophorous Thankyou everyone and yes Melanie, it was quite delicate but nowhere near the delicacy of say a Hygrocybe. Its a shame really, I had great hopes for this one but notwithstanding the colour, its going over the shoulder with the other LBJ`s into category 3!
Psathyrella candolleana? I`m going to think about that one.
Cheers
Pete |  | | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | | | | 25 members and 392 guests | | Acipiter, Anomalous, DRB, Fibonacci, GTH, Jennie, JennyS, Jim Ford, Joel.W, King Edward, markp, nikolai_avenger, nippynorman, nutmeg, RestlessLegsMan, Scubi, Sofija, Stalkball, stickman, sunnydale, tcvarlh, welsh.lensman, welshcameraman, Za | » New Wildlife Posts | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | » New Environment Posts | | | | | | | | | » New Activity Posts | | | | | | | | | » New Community Posts | | | | | | | | | |