| | S | M | T | W | T | F | S | | 29 | 30 | 31 |
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
| |
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
| |
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
| |
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
| |
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
| 1 | 2 | 3 | » Stats |
Members: 48,627
Threads: 78,830
Posts: 820,770
Top Poster: glsammy (14,775) | | Welcome to our newest member, Freddi | |  | | 
30-05-2009, 12:57 PM
|  | Knight Commander of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: Red Rose County
Posts: 5,070
| | | Panaeolus ? Found these yesterday, growing as a widely scattered troop of about 40 individuals, on a horse dung heap at a farm.
Fruitbodies all appeared to be of the same type of fungus, with specimens ranging from just emerged to very old.
Nearest I can get to an ID appears to be Panaeolus semiovatus - Egghead Mottlegill, but the physical size of some of these seems on the large side for that - Largest were easily 18cm tall, with caps 75-80mm across.
Any help with ID confirmation/other much appreciated.
Regards
Mike | 
30-05-2009, 05:29 PM
|  | Commander of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Nov 2007 Location: York
Posts: 3,229
| | | Re: Panaeolus ? Mike
Panaeolus semiovatus can be that size and a bit more so you are right with your id.
Mal | 
02-06-2009, 06:30 PM
|  | Knight Commander of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: Red Rose County
Posts: 5,070
| | | Re: Panaeolus ? Thanks Mal,
I thought logically, they should be Panaeolus semiovatus, but i've never found them anywhere near this size previously.
I was thrown slightly by the details in Jordan & Phillips, which (both) say they grow to 100mm stipe, with 60mm cap - which is considerably less than these were.
Regards
Mike. | 
02-06-2009, 06:47 PM
|  | Knight Commander of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: Scotland/Spain
Posts: 5,611
| | | Re: Panaeolus ? Cheers Mike, I was going to put this one up for ID but I think it's the same as yours (probably wrong again though  ). Found growing on high moorland from an old cow pat. There were hundreds in a small area but mostly old or dried up and very large specimens as it has been hot and sunny for the past few days.
Excuse the bad photograph but I had accidently set the ISO at 1500 on a very sunny day  and only realised later - a good lesson for me - check first.
__________________ As you get old three things occur. First your memory goes, and I can't remember the other two... | 
02-06-2009, 06:52 PM
|  | Knight Commander of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: Red Rose County
Posts: 5,070
| | | Re: Panaeolus ? Hi Ron,
Looks a cert. for Panaeolus semiovatus to me. - Identical to the ones I found. My previous (but smaller) ones were also found on cow dung, so habitat's right.
Regards
Mike. | 
02-06-2009, 06:55 PM
|  | Knight Commander of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: Scotland/Spain
Posts: 5,611
| | | Re: Panaeolus ? Cheers Mike and I wasn't even looking for fungi that day but couldn't miss them as they large and numerous.
Ron
__________________ As you get old three things occur. First your memory goes, and I can't remember the other two... | 
02-06-2009, 08:05 PM
|  | Commander of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Nov 2007 Location: York
Posts: 3,229
| | | Re: Panaeolus ? Quote:
Originally Posted by Lancashire Lad Thanks Mal,
I thought logically, they should be Panaeolus semiovatus, but i've never found them anywhere near this size previously.
I was thrown slightly by the details in Jordan & Phillips, which (both) say they grow to 100mm stipe, with 60mm cap - which is considerably less than these were.
Regards
Mike. | Mike
Bon gives the maximum as 150mm 
FoS 150mm 
Courtecuisse 180mm 
but Funga Nordica goes for the full 200mm 
Mal | 
02-06-2009, 10:28 PM
|  | Commander of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Jan 2009 Location: Jena - Germany
Posts: 1,362
| | | Re: Panaeolus ? Hello,
yes for the Panaeolus semiovatus, which is the only Pnaeolus with a sticky cap.
But the last two pictures show another Panaeolus species, may be even two different ones.
best regards,
Andreas
__________________ http://www.mollisia.de | 
02-06-2009, 11:20 PM
| | Commander of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Nov 2008 Location: Near Scarborough
Posts: 2,048
| | | Re: Panaeolus ? Quote:
Originally Posted by Lancashire Lad Thanks Mal,
I thought logically, they should be Panaeolus semiovatus, but i've never found them anywhere near this size previously.
I was thrown slightly by the details in Jordan & Phillips, which (both) say they grow to 100mm stipe, with 60mm cap - which is considerably less than these were.
Regards
Mike. | These were some grand ones I found last year. I didn't pick the biggest (the one in the foreground), it was too beautiful, but the next biggest is the one shown on the A4 sheet of paper (with a comparative tiddler) which should give an idea of the size. They were certainly whoppers ... 
Melanie | 
02-06-2009, 11:24 PM
|  | Knight Commander of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: Red Rose County
Posts: 5,070
| | | Re: Panaeolus ? Hi Andreas,
The last two photos were included as I thought they showed the same P.semiovatus firstly having dried out, and finally beginning to rot. (They were amongst the same troop).
I didn't consider that they might be a different species, so didn't take any further pics of those particular specimens.
Regards
Mike. |  | | | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | | | | 17 members and 217 guests | | davedotcom, Elizabeth B, Farplace, GTH, JB9302, John D, Johnny81, KentYeti, Kevin_H, Manders, pammosley, Pete Collins, PMG, poschiavanus, rmc, silver birder, Tursiops2 | » New Wildlife Posts | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | » New Environment Posts | | | | | | | | | » New Activity Posts | | | | | Kingfisher  Last post by GTH Yesterday 08:00 PM 1 Replies, 73 Views | | | » New Community Posts | | | | | | | | | |