| | S | M | T | W | T | F | S | | 29 | 30 |
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
| |
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
| |
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
| |
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
| |
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
31
| 1 | 2 | » Stats |
Members: 50,139
Threads: 82,300
Posts: 852,968
Top Poster: glsammy (15,069) | | Welcome to our newest member, jo0ls | |  | | 
07-04-2009, 08:21 PM
|  | Commander of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 3,089
| | | Coprinus ID found growing in open woodland. Dampish because of the moss....it was a spur-of-the-moment snap, so I didn't smell it or anything sorry
__________________ Leif | 
07-04-2009, 08:36 PM
|  | Knight of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: Sheffield
Posts: 8,928
| | | Re: Coprinus ID Quote:
Originally Posted by leifus found growing in open woodland. Dampish because of the moss....it was a spur-of-the-moment snap, so I didn't smell it or anything sorry  | Hi Leifus
This is coprinus micaceus
John | 
07-04-2009, 08:40 PM
|  | Commander of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 3,089
| | | Re: Coprinus ID Quote:
Originally Posted by FungiJohn Hi Leifus
This is coprinus micaceus
John  | thought it might be  thanks
__________________ Leif | 
07-04-2009, 09:42 PM
|  | Commander of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Nov 2007 Location: York
Posts: 3,314
| | | Re: Coprinus ID John
This doesn't look like a usual micaceus. The pileal surface is normally darker the veil is much more "granular" and it normally grows in large numbers.
Just a thought 
Mal | 
07-04-2009, 10:02 PM
|  | Knight of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: Sheffield
Posts: 8,928
| | | Re: Coprinus ID Quote:
Originally Posted by flaxton John
This doesn't look like a usual micaceus. The pileal surface is normally darker the veil is much more "granular" and it normally grows in large numbers.
Just a thought 
Mal | I see where you're coming from Mal but I still think it is C. micaceus.
I also think it may well have been re planted as an individual ... not that I would do such a thing
John | 
07-04-2009, 10:10 PM
|  | Knight Commander of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: Red Rose County
Posts: 5,205
| | | Re: Coprinus ID It looks quite like the C.micaceus I've been finding recently. I put the slightly different to normal appearance down to the fact that we've had showery/sunny weather, which I assumed had washed off the granules, with the caps then starting to dry.
I don't think the one in the photo has been replanted - but is being held up in front of the lens).
Regards
Mike. | 
08-04-2009, 07:04 AM
| | Wild Member | | Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 217
| | | Re: Coprinus ID Why not C. domesticus - just a thought and an error I have made in the past.
Fungalpunk Dave | 
08-04-2009, 07:50 AM
|  | Wild Member | | Join Date: Mar 2009 Location: Nottingham
Posts: 192
| | | Re: Coprinus ID Quote:
Originally Posted by Fungalpunk Why not C. domesticus - just a thought and an error I have made in the past.
Fungalpunk Dave | That would be my suggestion too - the red mycetial mat would fit but that, I believe, is highly suggestive and not diagnostic. | 
08-04-2009, 10:03 AM
|  | Knight of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: Sheffield
Posts: 8,928
| | | Re: Coprinus ID Quote:
Originally Posted by rich ard That would be my suggestion too - the red mycetial mat would fit but that, I believe, is highly suggestive and not diagnostic. | I did look carefully at the base for the typical ozonium carpet but wasn't convinced the red material was that. It is also typical with C. radians
C. domesticus is quite often found as a solitary specimen and in young fruitbodies (as shown here) it would normally have the remmant 'granules' on the cap surface.
This is a typical C. domesticus:
If any fungi are indeed 'typical' 
John | 
08-04-2009, 02:40 PM
| | Officer of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Jul 2008 Location: NW London
Posts: 802
| | | Re: Coprinus ID Quote:
Originally Posted by FungiJohn I did look carefully at the base for the typical ozonium carpet but wasn't convinced the red material was that. It is also typical with C. radians
C. domesticus is quite often found as a solitary specimen and in young fruitbodies (as shown here) it would normally have the remmant 'granules' on the cap surface.
This is a typical C. domesticus:
If any fungi are indeed 'typical' 
John  | I would say its most likely to be C. domesticus John. Most certainly not C. micaceus
Andy |  | | | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | | | | 32 members and 492 guests | | Ace, afcsupporter, AfternoonLemon, agrumpycow, borg, ChrisJB, Douglas, dsana123, earthdragon64, Farplace, Ferret, fox403, Geoff F, Gillboy, Iona F, jaguarondi, jo0ls, Johnny Redgate, Ladywell, little_auk11, MegaCindy, nutmeg, paulinemiller10, Pepsis, PicaPica, rmc, RoyW, speyghillie, stickman, Wharfrat, Za | » New Wildlife Posts | | | | | | | ID please Today 07:51 PM 11 Replies, 216 Views | | | | | | | | | » New Environment Posts | | | | | | | | | » New Activity Posts | | | | | | | | | » New Community Posts | | | | | | | | | |