| | S | M | T | W | T | F | S | | 29 | 30 |
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
| |
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
| |
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
| |
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
| |
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
31
| 1 | 2 | » Stats |
Members: 50,142
Threads: 82,310
Posts: 853,028
Top Poster: glsammy (15,069) | | Welcome to our newest member, Posbyonechop | |  | 
11-02-2009, 03:05 PM
|  | Officer of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: worksop north notts
Posts: 839
| | | Citocybe sp id confirmation these three species were found late autumn o8 , i've narrowed the first two down to 1/ clitocybe clavipes ?? 2/ possibly Clitocybe gibba ??, 3/ not at all sure now if this is a clitocybe at all, did think it might be Hygrophoropsis aurantiaca, but colour seems wrong ??
no1 was about 4" across cap , under birch and conifer trees
no2 was about 3" across cap, under conifer trees
no3 was about 2" across cap, in grassy area
spore prints from 1 & 2 where white, no spore print from 3
1/
2/
3/ | 
11-02-2009, 03:25 PM
|  | Commander of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Oct 2008 Location: Durham
Posts: 1,481
| | | Re: Citocybe sp id confirmation Lovely pics  Well done you.Sure someone will come along and help | 
11-02-2009, 03:58 PM
|  | Commander of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Nov 2007 Location: York
Posts: 3,314
| | | Re: Citocybe sp id confirmation The first I would agree with the second probably right but the third not Hygrophoropsis but looks more like a Lactarius.
Mal | 
11-02-2009, 04:06 PM
|  | Commander of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Aug 2008 Location: Preston in NW
Posts: 3,698
| | | Re: Citocybe sp id confirmation no.1 looks like clitocybe nebularis to me. The shape of the cap and edges clinches it for me. They do this as they mature. | 
11-02-2009, 04:28 PM
|  | Knight Commander of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Sep 2006 Location: East Harling, Norfolk
Posts: 8,965
| | | Re: Citocybe sp id confirmation I would agree with Ampulloclitocybe clavipes for the first. | 
11-02-2009, 05:49 PM
|  | Knight of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: Sheffield
Posts: 8,929
| | | Re: Citocybe sp id confirmation Quote:
Originally Posted by flaxton The first I would agree with the second probably right but the third not Hygrophoropsis but looks more like a Lactarius.
Mal | I fully agree with Mal on Lactarius ... You can even see the exuding milk droplets
John
Last edited by FungiJohn; 11-02-2009 at 06:28 PM.
| 
11-02-2009, 05:52 PM
|  | Commander of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Jan 2009 Location: Jena - Germany
Posts: 1,458
| | | Re: Citocybe sp id confirmation Hallo,
I would agree for the first as (Ampullo)Clitocybe clavipes.
The 2nd is also (Ampullo)Clitocybe clavipes, at least the 2nd picture of the 2nd row is this species for sure.
The 3rd is a Lactarius, you can easily see this in the 2nd picture at the fruitbody that is turned over. There are droplets of milk between the gills. It looks somewhat like Lactarius lilacinus, but in that age it usually is more lilac. Can you tell for this one something to the ecology? L. lilacinus would need damp place with Alnus.
best regards,
Andreas
__________________ http://www.mollisia.de
Last edited by mollisia; 11-02-2009 at 05:56 PM.
| 
11-02-2009, 07:55 PM
|  | Officer of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: worksop north notts
Posts: 839
| | | Re: Citocybe sp id confirmation Quote:
Originally Posted by mollisia Hallo,
I would agree for the first as (Ampullo)Clitocybe clavipes.
The 2nd is also (Ampullo)Clitocybe clavipes, at least the 2nd picture of the 2nd row is this species for sure.
The 3rd is a Lactarius, you can easily see this in the 2nd picture at the fruitbody that is turned over. There are droplets of milk between the gills. It looks somewhat like Lactarius lilacinus, but in that age it usually is more lilac. Can you tell for this one something to the ecology? L. lilacinus would need damp place with Alnus.
best regards,
Andreas | thanks for all your suggestions,
all the specimens shown were found in the same area, no more than 15/20ft apart,
no1/ was under birch and conifers at one side of the footpath, and was a solitary specimen,
no2/ was on the other side of the footpath under conifers growing in a ring as can be seen in the pictures
while no3/ was in grass where the two footpaths joined, soil very dry sandy/stony in this area of Clumber(holywell wood area)
according to notes taken at the time, no 3 did not produce any milk droplets when cut , the cap was dry and not greasy/sticky and the white bloom rubbed off very easily,
Brian. |  | | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | | » New Wildlife Posts | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | » New Environment Posts | | | | | | | | | » New Activity Posts | | | | | | | | | » New Community Posts | | | | | | | | | |