| | S | M | T | W | T | F | S | | 29 | 30 |
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
| |
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
| |
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
| |
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
| |
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
31
| 1 | 2 | » Stats |
Members: 50,142
Threads: 82,310
Posts: 853,028
Top Poster: glsammy (15,069) | | Welcome to our newest member, Posbyonechop | | 
08-02-2009, 05:40 PM
|  | Commander of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Aug 2008 Location: Preston in NW
Posts: 3,698
| | | Rigidiporus or T. Gibbosa? I found these on an old oak stump next to Rivington Hill. Is this Trametes gibbosa or Rigidiporus Ulmarius. All the other T. gibbosa I have found has been smaller and more greener when encrusted with algae - this was quite yellow.
This was a younger one.
Thanks | 
08-02-2009, 06:46 PM
|  | Commander of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Nov 2007 Location: York
Posts: 3,314
| | | Re: Rigidiporus or T. Gibbosa? KT
I know you didn't take a photo of the pores  but you must have looked and taken notes because you knew we would ask  T gibbosa pores slot-like 1-2 per mm R ulmarius round 5-8 per mm. So which was it then we will give an positive ID.
Mal | 
08-02-2009, 07:34 PM
|  | Commander of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Aug 2008 Location: Preston in NW
Posts: 3,698
| | | Re: Rigidiporus or T. Gibbosa? the pores were round and there were lots of them  so R. ulmonarius |  | | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | | » New Wildlife Posts | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | » New Environment Posts | | | | | | | | | » New Activity Posts | | | | | | | | | » New Community Posts | | | | | | | | | |