| | S | M | T | W | T | F | S | | 29 | 30 |
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
| |
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
| |
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
| |
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
| |
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
31
| 1 | 2 | » Stats |
Members: 50,142
Threads: 82,310
Posts: 853,028
Top Poster: glsammy (15,069) | | Welcome to our newest member, Posbyonechop | |  | 
01-02-2009, 09:33 PM
|  | Active Member | | Join Date: Nov 2008 Location: WORCESTERSHIRE
Posts: 73
| | | fungi ID please can anybody help with ID on the following 
thanks
yorkie lad | 
01-02-2009, 09:38 PM
|  | Knight Commander of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Sep 2006 Location: East Harling, Norfolk
Posts: 8,965
| | | Re: fungi ID please Absolutely Yorkie!
Your first is a Xylaria sp, probably Xylaria longipes as opposed to its chunkier cousin, X. polymorpha.
The second image shows without question Piptoporus betulinus.
Nick | 
01-02-2009, 09:47 PM
|  | Active Member | | Join Date: Nov 2008 Location: WORCESTERSHIRE
Posts: 73
| | | Re: fungi ID please thanks Nick
we thought no,1 might be trichoglossum hirsutum
yorkie lad | 
01-02-2009, 09:49 PM
|  | Knight Commander of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Sep 2006 Location: East Harling, Norfolk
Posts: 8,965
| | | Re: fungi ID please Tricholglossum and Geoglossum do look similar to these Xylaria. The difference is that the former grow in lush grassland and the latter prefer wood substrates. The physical texture is also massively different; Xylaria are tough and hard to the tough whereas Tricholglossum/Geoglossum are soft and spongy, exuding water if you apply pressure to them.
Hope that helps,
Nick | 
01-02-2009, 09:59 PM
|  | Knight Commander of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: Red Rose County
Posts: 5,205
| | | Re: fungi ID please Interesting this.
What do you make of these? - I found them in November (I think), but had them down as Xylaria hypoxylon that had had the white spores washed off.
Are they likely to be Xylaria longipipes?
Regards
Mike. | 
01-02-2009, 10:05 PM
|  | Knight Commander of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Sep 2006 Location: East Harling, Norfolk
Posts: 8,965
| | | Re: fungi ID please Flat ends so I would assume that they were X. hypoxylon Mike. | 
01-02-2009, 10:16 PM
|  | Knight Commander of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: Red Rose County
Posts: 5,205
| | | Re: fungi ID please Quote:
Originally Posted by NickCantle Flat ends so I would assume that they were X. hypoxylon Mike. | I was tempted to post after looking at the right hand most specimen in Yorkie Lad's pic. which (viewed at largest size) also seems to have a flat end.
Wishful thinking on my part I assume.
Regards
Mike. | 
01-02-2009, 10:20 PM
|  | Active Member | | Join Date: Nov 2008 Location: WORCESTERSHIRE
Posts: 73
| | | Re: fungi ID please thanks for clearing up Nick |  | | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | | » New Wildlife Posts | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | » New Environment Posts | | | | | | | | | » New Activity Posts | | | | | | | | | » New Community Posts | | | | | | | | | |