| | S | M | T | W | T | F | S | | 29 | 30 |
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
| |
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
| |
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
| |
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
| |
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
31
| 1 | 2 | » Stats |
Members: 50,141
Threads: 82,309
Posts: 853,027
Top Poster: glsammy (15,069) | | Welcome to our newest member, nippynorman | |  | 
01-01-2009, 07:58 PM
| | Wild Member | | Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 199
| | | Are these Dead Man's Fingers?
I saw these today and thought they might be Dead Man's Fingers, but they seemed shorter and thinner than the ones I'd seen before, are they? | 
01-01-2009, 08:00 PM
|  | Commander of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Aug 2008 Location: Preston in NW
Posts: 3,698
| | | Re: Are these Dead Man's Fingers? I think those are dead molls fingers - xylaria longipes. they are usually thinner and shorter than dead mans fingers as you say | 
01-01-2009, 08:02 PM
|  | Commander of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 3,089
| | | Re: Are these Dead Man's Fingers? Xylaria longipes
__________________ Leif | 
01-01-2009, 08:05 PM
|  | Knight Commander of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Sep 2006 Location: East Harling, Norfolk
Posts: 8,965
| | | Re: Are these Dead Man's Fingers? For some reason I am leaning towards the other option, Xylaria polymorpha. X. Longipes is very slender indeed and has a less irregular structure whereas these specimens are quite lumpy and large in places.
Though looking again, I can see why you'd suggest X. longipes (I think you're right) I'll sit on the fence for this one | 
01-01-2009, 08:07 PM
|  | Commander of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Aug 2008 Location: Preston in NW
Posts: 3,698
| | | Re: Are these Dead Man's Fingers? you have a point. I heard xylarias are confirmed by microscopy however one I saw and was IDed on WAB as X. longipes looked very similar to this with the very thin bottom and then got fatter as it got towards the top. | 
01-01-2009, 08:11 PM
| | Wild Member | | Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 199
| | | Re: Are these Dead Man's Fingers? Does this help? | 
01-01-2009, 08:11 PM
|  | Knight Commander of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Sep 2006 Location: East Harling, Norfolk
Posts: 8,965
| | | Re: Are these Dead Man's Fingers? Well these two species are often confused it seems. People see a thin one and assume it's X. longipes, and people see a chunky one and think it's X. polymorpha. I would presume in both cases it's more likely to be X. polymorpha. The same rule applies with the Xylaria as it does with any other fungi- the rule of atypical specimens! | 
01-01-2009, 08:12 PM
| | Wild Member | | Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 199
| | | Re: Are these Dead Man's Fingers? Does this help? | 
01-01-2009, 08:12 PM
|  | Knight Commander of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Sep 2006 Location: East Harling, Norfolk
Posts: 8,965
| | | Re: Are these Dead Man's Fingers? Quote:
Originally Posted by Yashca Does this help?  | Makes me think more X. longipes. I did initially think "But they're smaller, so they may not be very far in terms of development" but then I wised up and realised that all of the immature X. polymorpha I've ever seen are fat chunky things! | 
01-01-2009, 08:14 PM
|  | Commander of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Aug 2008 Location: Preston in NW
Posts: 3,698
| | | Re: Are these Dead Man's Fingers? agreed. it is X. longipes |  | | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | | » New Wildlife Posts | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | » New Environment Posts | | | | | | | | | » New Activity Posts | | | | | | | | | » New Community Posts | | | | | | | | | |