Possibly Phlebia tremellosa ?

[NickCantle]

Originally Posted by KeenTeen17

Its looking a lot like an old P. tephroleuca

Originally Posted by KeenTeen17

Its not in my Philips. So could you check your Jordans and see if its in. I am quite curious now.

So you were unsure upon your suggestion?

[KeenTeen17]

Originally Posted by Lancashire Lad

Sorry Keenteen, Jordan only includes P. caesia, P. stiptica, and P. subcaesia.

I've just Googled for images of P. tephroleuca but nothing's coming up that seems to look anything like my specimen.

Regards
Mike.

try Tyromyces Lacteus

[Lancashire Lad]

Originally Posted by KeenTeen17

try Tyromyces Lacteus

That's not in Jordan either, and I can't seem to find any decent images by Googling for it.

Regards
Mike.

[KeenTeen17]

I think it was either flaxton or C&B who gave me the name P. tephroleuca in the thread
Bjerkandera Adusta?
Bjerkandera Adusta?

[NickCantle]

Well in your book it shows Tyromyces lacteus KT, you said it yourself. Cybershot went on to say that on the BC it's now Postia tephroleuca. Same species, different names, so what does it say in your book about it KT?

[flaxton]

Originally Posted by KeenTeen17

I think it was either flaxton or C&B who gave me the name P. tephroleuca in the thread
Bjerkandera Adusta?
Bjerkandera Adusta?

It was Cybershot

[Lancashire Lad]

Originally Posted by KeenTeen17

I think it was either flaxton or C&B who gave me the name P. tephroleuca in the thread
Bjerkandera Adusta?
Bjerkandera Adusta?

Hi Keenteen - It looks similar to this photo of yours from the B. adusta thread: -


But I think the undersides of my example are different: -


Regards
Mike.

[KeenTeen17]

Originally Posted by Lancashire Lad

Hi Keenteen - It looks similar to this photo of yours from the B. adusta thread: -


But I think the undersides of my example are different: -


Regards
Mike.

It might be because yours is a really old specimen. Mine got really old within weeks and decomposed to be like yours. thats probably why the undersides look a bit different

[Lancashire Lad]

Originally Posted by KeenTeen17

It might be because yours is a really old specimen. Mine got really old within weeks and decomposed to be like yours. thats probably why the undersides look a bit different

I don't know exactly how old it is - but it wasn't there about a month back when I last went to the site.

I thought it would have been quite young though, because there is no signs of obvious deterioration or the usual debris & such that seems to find its way onto older specimens.

A mystery

Regards
Mike.