| | S | M | T | W | T | F | S | | 29 | 30 |
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
| |
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
| |
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
| |
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
| |
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
31
| 1 | 2 | » Stats |
Members: 50,139
Threads: 82,300
Posts: 852,954
Top Poster: glsammy (15,069) | | Welcome to our newest member, jo0ls | |  | 
11-12-2008, 08:48 AM
|  | Officer of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: worksop north notts
Posts: 839
| | | bracket fungi for id a friend who knowing of my interest in fungi, brought this to me , it was found on what he believed was a beech branch, size is 70mm wide x 50mm depth and 30mm thick, feels dry and corky, there were 3 or 4 more on the branch,
probably an old specimen of something?
any suggestions please?
top view
underside view
thanks,
Brian. | 
11-12-2008, 10:29 AM
|  | Commander of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Aug 2008 Location: Preston in NW
Posts: 3,698
| | | Re: bracket fungi for id you could test it with KOH and see if it discolours. if so. its hapalopilus nidulans | 
11-12-2008, 11:01 AM
|  | Commander of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Nov 2007 Location: York
Posts: 3,314
| | | Re: bracket fungi for id I think it is too thick to be nidulans but with the signs of red Daedaleopsis confragosa - Blushing Bracket is much more likely
Mal | 
11-12-2008, 11:27 AM
|  | Commander of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Aug 2008 Location: Preston in NW
Posts: 3,698
| | | Re: bracket fungi for id these old things are really confusing | 
11-12-2008, 11:55 AM
|  | Commander of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Nov 2007 Location: York
Posts: 3,314
| | | Re: bracket fungi for id That's why the validity of most identifications should be taken very cautiously on these "past it" fruit bodies. But that shouldn't mean we ignore them altogether. A rotting fruit body that might be Piptoporus quercinus might not be able to be identified this year but noted for next. (not suggesting the one in this thread might be, just an observation)
Mal | 
11-12-2008, 05:29 PM
|  | Knight Commander of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Sep 2006 Location: East Harling, Norfolk
Posts: 8,965
| | | Re: bracket fungi for id Quote:
Originally Posted by flaxton I think it is too thick to be nidulans but with the signs of red Daedaleopsis confragosa - Blushing Bracket is much more likely
Mal | Definitely shows signs of your suggestion Mal, but just wondered how you reckon this is too thick for H. nidulans. You ID'd mine the other day and that was about the same size!   In this thread; Help With Bracket From September.
Having said that, I know absolutely nothing about H. nidulans so my comments are pointless | 
11-12-2008, 06:29 PM
|  | Officer of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: worksop north notts
Posts: 839
| | | Re: bracket fungi for id Quote:
Originally Posted by flaxton That's why the validity of most identifications should be taken very cautiously on these "past it" fruit bodies. But that shouldn't mean we ignore them altogether. A rotting fruit body that might be Piptoporus quercinus might not be able to be identified this year but noted for next. (not suggesting the one in this thread might be, just an observation)
Mal | thanks to you all for your suggestions, it looks like one of those that you have to forget you found,
on close inspection it looked to be about 3 brackets fused into one, when i cut across the body it was very dry and solid and a light coffee colour, and obviously a very old specimen,
ill get a better description of where it was found and try and have a look at what appears next year, might be lucky and find a younger example then for a better chance
Brian. | 
11-12-2008, 07:20 PM
|  | Commander of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Nov 2007 Location: York
Posts: 3,314
| | | Re: bracket fungi for id Quote:
Originally Posted by NickCantle Definitely shows signs of your suggestion Mal, but just wondered how you reckon this is too thick for H. nidulans. You ID'd mine the other day and that was about the same size!   In this thread; Help With Bracket From September.
Having said that, I know absolutely nothing about H. nidulans so my comments are pointless  | I'm taking the fifth
When I have found nidulans it has always been more Trametes rather than Piptoporus in stature so your specimen was thicker than I would normally have expected BUT it had the look - the nice coffee colour and velvet upper surface. This one is thick but doesn't have the look  (except for the coffee colour inside  )
Mal |  | | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | | | | 32 members and 458 guests | | Ace, aeshna5, afcsupporter, Andy Healey, Anomalous, chattycaff, Deb London, Douglas, Elizabeth B, faz, fox403, Geoff F, gerard Le Saffre, Graeme Robson, Indian Joe, jo0ls, John Taylor, Ladywell, Malkie, MattPrince, MegaCindy, monkey, Normski4ash, Pete Collins, Richard Baber, rmc, searcher, spaldingd, The, The Magpie, Tursiops2, Ukwildlifeo | » New Wildlife Posts | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | » New Environment Posts | | | | | | | | | » New Activity Posts | | | | | | | | | » New Community Posts | | | | | | | | | |