Microscope imagers or minicams?

[NickCantle]

That image really is great Mal, and I looked at the alternative to this software in Mac format and it's about £90-100 which I probably can't justify spending.

[Chris Yeates]

Originally Posted by SheffieldLass

Chris and Mal

That 3d image ability is what we really want!... Great that someone has done some excellent shareware software. The commercial software is very expensive, so wasn't an option at all for me. I'll check it out ...

Melanie

hi Melanie

you've probably already found it but the site is at I N D E X

PS I'll be in contact soon re the Yorks records question

Chris

[flaxton]

Originally Posted by NickCantle

That image really is great Mal, and I looked at the alternative to this software in Mac format and it's about £90-100 which I probably can't justify spending.

Thanks Nick
I am sure with your photographic skills you would be able to get some (even more) great photos. If I can produce this with the camera set to take half a dozen photos and just hand held just think what you could do.
Try MycoImage this is nearer what I would expect from you This is the chap who showed me how to work the software.
Mal

[Chris Yeates]

excellent images, but I can't quite see the advantage over a tripod and a long exposure at a high F number . . . .

I feel that it's in the realm of micrographs that CombineZ really comes into its own

Chris

[Morchella]

Nick,

Have you looked at this software Keith's Image Stacker ?

It is designed for astronomy but it is image stacking so might be worth trying out.

Morchella