| | S | M | T | W | T | F | S | | 29 | 30 |
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
| |
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
| |
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
| |
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
| |
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
31
| 1 | 2 | » Stats |
Members: 50,139
Threads: 82,298
Posts: 852,934
Top Poster: glsammy (15,069) | | Welcome to our newest member, jo0ls | |  | | 
04-11-2008, 11:33 AM
|  | Commander of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: Hertfordshire..
Posts: 2,488
| | | Stropharia sp..? Found this group growing under Cedar of lebanon tree..
Appreciate help with ID please..
Cheers Guys..
Julie
__________________ A Promise isn't kept until Its Delivered. | 
04-11-2008, 11:57 AM
| | Wild Member | | Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 217
| | | Re: Stropharia sp..? Whilst I am on-line (a rare occasion indeed Stropharia caerulea is my shot The gills look right and the white mycelium is another clue and not obvious on similar species.
FP/OMD | 
04-11-2008, 12:07 PM
|  | Commander of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Oct 2008 Location: Huddersfield, West Yorkshire
Posts: 3,648
| | | Re: Stropharia sp..? hi
I agree with the above
Chris | 
04-11-2008, 12:14 PM
|  | Commander of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: Hertfordshire..
Posts: 2,488
| | | Re: Stropharia sp..? Cheers to you both...much appreciated..
Julie
__________________ A Promise isn't kept until Its Delivered. | 
04-11-2008, 03:40 PM
|  | Commander of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: Yateley, Hampshire
Posts: 3,231
| | | Re: Stropharia sp..? I would be interested to know why, other than for the reasons stated, the decision favoured S. caerulea rather than S. aeruginosa - Verdigris Agaric, which is what I would have plumbed for?
David
Last edited by cybershot; 04-11-2008 at 03:58 PM.
| 
04-11-2008, 04:24 PM
| | Commander of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 4,261
| | | Re: Stropharia sp..? Hi David,
I too agree on S.caerulea the only reason being because of the barely discernible 'ring' on the stem "even when young". S. aeruginosa when young has a more obvious ring, the upper surface even being blue /green - the same colour as the cap, but beware, this disappears quickly.
There is also a difference in the gill edges, but I challenge anyone to say which is which from this (excellent) photo.
Neil.
Fungalpunk mentioned the white mycelium also being an indicator - I'm not aware of this, but this would be a very handy pointer.
Last edited by fairplay; 04-11-2008 at 04:35 PM.
| 
04-11-2008, 04:27 PM
|  | Commander of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: Yateley, Hampshire
Posts: 3,231
| | | Re: Stropharia sp..? All good pointers to work with thanks Neil - back to the references for further investigation.
David | 
04-11-2008, 08:18 PM
| | Wild Member | | Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 217
| | | Re: Stropharia sp..? R. Courtecuisse makes a point of the white mycelium being white and experience tells me this is more often present than in similar species. Not always but more often! Also the yellowing of this species is a good pointer.
Also yes I agree with Fairplay - hardly any ring evidence. Oops and to add Aeruginosa is usually darker and gills are white when young and go darker - some of these seem young and are already darkish.
As always it is better to have the blighters in your hand so this is a mere guideline but conveniently raises ID tips. Perhaps this time next year all species will be the same anyway ha, ha.
Fungalpunk/OMD | 
04-11-2008, 11:37 PM
|  | Member of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Nov 2007 Location: North London
Posts: 388
| | | Re: Stropharia sp..? "which is what I would have plumbed for?"
Intriguing image David! Mind you I think I know some plumbers like that | 
06-11-2008, 04:28 PM
|  | Commander of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: Yateley, Hampshire
Posts: 3,231
| | | Re: Stropharia sp..? Having accompanied Julie to the park today where she showed me these trooping in two different locations I am convinced that the macro features, especially the deeper blue green colour of the younger caps and the covering of whitish woolly scales below the ring, more closely match the descriptions of S. aeruginosa in the popular references. After this experience it is easy to see why there is so much confusion and maybe, stretching a point, it would not be beyond the realms of possibility that both species were present, or that Dave's prophecy above is not quite so radical after all.
David
Last edited by cybershot; 06-11-2008 at 04:41 PM.
|  | | | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | | | | 32 members and 434 guests | | 2dogs2000, Africa, Alan Ledbrooke, barnbear, borg, briar rose, d c, Deb London, Dillybythesea, Douglas, dsana123, earthdragon64, frits_b, jaguarondi, JennyS, jo0ls, Johnny Redgate, k4t3, Kenneth Baldwin, pammosley, Pete Collins, Rambling Rob, RaptorMan101, reefbirder, RobSutton, scamps180, steve47, sweedie, Tam73, wiz, Xav, Za | » New Wildlife Posts | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | » New Environment Posts | | | | | | | | | » New Activity Posts | | | | | | | | | » New Community Posts | | | | | | | | | |