| | S | M | T | W | T | F | S | | 29 | 30 |
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
| |
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
| |
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
| |
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
| |
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
31
| 1 | 2 |  » Stats |
Members: 50,138
Threads: 82,298
Posts: 852,932
Top Poster: glsammy (15,069)
| | Welcome to our newest member, Tam73 | |  | 
28-10-2008, 05:34 PM
| | Wild Member | | Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 124
| | | Three fungi for ID please
|
28-10-2008, 08:10 PM
|  | Commander of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Aug 2008 Location: Preston in NW
Posts: 3,698
| | | Re: Three fungi for ID please
1. could be a lactarius
2.I am thinking lepista flaccida
3. russula ochroleuca |
28-10-2008, 10:49 PM
| | Officer of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Jul 2008 Location: NW London
Posts: 802
| | | Re: Three fungi for ID please
Quote:
Originally Posted by lynnek  | Hi,
The first of your species is most likely Lactarius camphoratus the second a tad tricky, I can't really see what is happening on the underside? The 3rd is a [i]Tricholoma/I], possibly T. equestre, not sure about this though, as it is quite viscid.
Andy  |
28-10-2008, 10:51 PM
| | Commander of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 4,261
| | | Re: Three fungi for ID please
I'm useless with Lactarius species but I would guess this is L. rufous
No 2. Camarophyllus pratensis possibly. (Has name changed ?)
No 3. Tricholoma sulphureum or one simillar.
Neil.
Last edited by fairplay; 28-10-2008 at 10:54 PM.
|
28-10-2008, 10:57 PM
|  | Commander of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Nov 2007 Location: York
Posts: 3,314
| | | Re: Three fungi for ID please
The second looks like Hygrocybe pratensis but the location doesn't look right.
Mal |
29-10-2008, 09:24 AM
| | Officer of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Jul 2008 Location: NW London
Posts: 802
| | | Re: Three fungi for ID please
Quote:
Originally Posted by flaxton The second looks like Hygrocybe pratensis but the location doesn't look right.
Mal | Yea, this 2nd one wants to be alot of things, I want to say [i]Laccaria/I] but it looks way too big for that, there just isn't enough detail. I do think now that the Tricholoma is in fact T. equestre due to the conifer association in the picture. This is in fact very rare away from Scotland, worth double checking this. The Lactarius could well be be L. rufus.
Andy | | |
| Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes |  Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
| | |
| | | 24 members and 450 guests | | barnbear, borg, Dillybythesea, Douglas, earthdragon64, frits_b, jaguarondi, Jim Ford, k4t3, Kenneth Baldwin, Ladywell, Pete Collins, Podgod, Rambling Rob, RaptorMan101, reefbirder, RobSutton, scamps180, spaldingd, steve47, Tam73, wiz, Xav, Za | » New Wildlife Posts | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | » New Environment Posts | | | | | | | | | » New Activity Posts | | | | | | | | | » New Community Posts | | | | | | | | | |
