| | S | M | T | W | T | F | S | | 29 | 30 |
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
| |
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
| |
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
| |
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
| |
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
31
| 1 | 2 | » Stats |
Members: 50,138
Threads: 82,298
Posts: 852,932
Top Poster: glsammy (15,069) | | Welcome to our newest member, Tam73 | |  | 
26-10-2008, 06:41 PM
|  | Officer of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Nov 2007 Location: East Yorkshire
Posts: 691
| | | Inonotus radiatus I had a little foray on the North Yorkshire Moors at Goathland. There wasn`t much about but a couple of interesting ones that I would apprciate help with.
I think this one is Inonotus radiatus but Jordan says it is rare?
I can`t get near this one. It was thickly encrusted on rotten hawthorn or elder with small brackets developing in places, does Hyphondontia sambuci develop brackets?
Cheers
Pete
Last edited by watsthat; 26-10-2008 at 06:51 PM.
Reason: Additional info
| 
26-10-2008, 10:04 PM
| | Commander of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 4,261
| | | Re: Inonotus radiatus If your first photo was growing on Alder then this would be I.radiatus
I've no idea why Michael is saying this is rare as this is very common in Suffolk and probably elsewhere. Hyphodontia sambucii is entirely resupinate and does not form brackets, I think what you may have here is an uncommon form of Trametes gibbosa.
Neil. | 
27-10-2008, 01:02 PM
|  | Officer of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Nov 2007 Location: East Yorkshire
Posts: 691
| | | Re: Inonotus radiatus Quote:
Originally Posted by fairplay If your first photo was growing on Alder then this would be I.radiatus
I've no idea why Michael is saying this is rare as this is very common in Suffolk and probably elsewhere. Hyphodontia sambucii is entirely resupinate and does not form brackets, I think what you may have here is an uncommon form of Trametes gibbosa.
Neil.  | Interesting Neil and thanks very much.
Tree in question was probably Alder, (there were lots around) but I failed at the first hurdle on this one, by under estimating the importance of the tree species! The Trametes gibbosa opinion is interesting, its just goes to show how difficult identification can be!
Pete |  | | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | | | | 22 members and 450 guests | | borg, Dillybythesea, Douglas, earthdragon64, frits_b, jaguarondi, Jim Ford, k4t3, Kenneth Baldwin, Ladywell, Pete Collins, Podgod, Rambling Rob, RaptorMan101, reefbirder, scamps180, spaldingd, steve47, Tam73, wiz, Xav, Za | » New Wildlife Posts | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | » New Environment Posts | | | | | | | | | » New Activity Posts | | | | | | | | | » New Community Posts | | | | | | | | | |