| | S | M | T | W | T | F | S | | 29 | 30 |
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
| |
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
| |
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
| |
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
| |
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
31
| 1 | 2 | » Stats |
Members: 50,137
Threads: 82,298
Posts: 852,932
Top Poster: glsammy (15,069) | | Welcome to our newest member, timbo5 | |  | | 
23-10-2008, 11:19 AM
| | Wild Member | | Join Date: Oct 2008 Location: east midlands
Posts: 169
| | | white fungi identification Hi All , i am new to this group and this will be my first post(my second really ,i tried to post this before but it did not show up for some reason)
i found this fungi in pine woods ,there were six , growing in a line ,the largest was about 5 or 6 inch across, i asked some one who was taking some photos of some clitocybe nebularis in the same woods what they were,but he did not know either, he suggested that they were a clitocybe also but they did not seem right,
so if anyone has an answer, that would be great,
thanks , Joseph | 
23-10-2008, 08:24 PM
|  | Commander of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Aug 2008 Location: Preston in NW
Posts: 3,698
| | | Re: white fungi identification Did it smell of aniseed - if it did, it could be C. fragrans
or if not it could be C. revulosa (just guessing from the Gallery)   | 
23-10-2008, 08:35 PM
|  | Knight Commander of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Sep 2006 Location: East Harling, Norfolk
Posts: 8,965
| | | Re: white fungi identification Well, given the habitat and the number in the troop, I'd say the closest I can get is Collybia maculata before it develops the rust coloured markings it's well known for. The gill attachment, or lack of, would also suggest this species. | 
24-10-2008, 09:10 AM
| | Wild Member | | Join Date: Oct 2008 Location: east midlands
Posts: 169
| | | Re: white fungi identification Quote:
Originally Posted by KeenTeen17 Did it smell of aniseed - if it did, it could be C. fragrans
or if not it could be C. revulosa (just guessing from the Gallery)    | Hi, it had no smell to it that i could find other than a very faint earthy smell,
and both C.fragrans & c.rivulosa dont (normally) grow in pine woods ,so i dont think it is either of those,(probably wrong again  ) ,
thanks for the suggestions,
Joseph. | 
24-10-2008, 09:17 AM
| | Wild Member | | Join Date: Oct 2008 Location: east midlands
Posts: 169
| | | Re: white fungi identification Quote:
Originally Posted by NickCantle Well, given the habitat and the number in the troop, I'd say the closest I can get is Collybia maculata before it develops the rust coloured markings it's well known for. The gill attachment, or lack of, would also suggest this species. | Hi , thats one i had not considered ! ,although most of the Collybia maculata i have found have usually got their brown staining long before reaching this size ,
the only other one i can find that resembles this , is Tricholoma alba or is that just a wild guess ??
thanks,
Josef | 
24-10-2008, 10:15 AM
| | Commander of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 4,261
| | | Re: white fungi identification Tricholoma is more probable, whitish species with Birch are likely to be T. stiparophyllum with an earthy, unpleasant smell, but if with other broadleaved trees may be T.lascivum, with a 'sweetish, repulsive smell'
Don't rely on smell descriptions though, they are just too unreliable. (and don't rely on my out of date names - they've probably been changed now)
Neil. | 
24-10-2008, 02:27 PM
| | Wild Member | | Join Date: Oct 2008 Location: east midlands
Posts: 169
| | | Re: white fungi identification Quote:
Originally Posted by fairplay Tricholoma is more probable, whitish species with Birch are likely to be T. stiparophyllum with an earthy, unpleasant smell, but if with other broadleaved trees may be T.lascivum, with a 'sweetish, repulsive smell'
Don't rely on smell descriptions though, they are just too unreliable. (and don't rely on my out of date names - they've probably been changed now)
Neil.  | Hello Neil,
thanks for the input, the specimens were found with conifers (the leaves in the photograph had most likely blown into the pines from across the track) as it was mostly birch and beech across the track,and these were about 300yds into the pinewood , so probably discounts any connection with broadleaved trees ?
Joseph. | 
24-10-2008, 10:40 PM
| | Commander of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 4,261
| | | Re: white fungi identification Dratt and double dratt !! I don't know what else to suggest.
Sorry, Neil. | 
25-10-2008, 08:11 PM
| | Member of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 418
| | | Re: white fungi identification How about Hygrophorus eburneus? | 
25-10-2008, 10:09 PM
| | Commander of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 4,261
| | | Re: white fungi identification Hygrophorus eburneus - hmmm, that's a good call, especially as there are Beech leaves in the photo, but the gills in the photo here don't seem to be decurrent as with H.eburneus
The gills in the photo seem more 'notched' than anything else. I hope you agree.
Neil. |  | | | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | | | | 18 members and 451 guests | | borg, Columbarius, Douglas, frits_b, jaguarondi, Jim Ford, k4t3, Kenneth Baldwin, Ladywell, Pete Collins, Podgod, Rambling Rob, reefbirder, scamps180, Scubi, spaldingd, steve47, thunder | » New Wildlife Posts | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | » New Environment Posts | | | | | | | | | » New Activity Posts | | | | | | | | | » New Community Posts | | | | | | | | | |