| | S | M | T | W | T | F | S | | 29 | 30 |
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
| |
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
| |
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
| |
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
| |
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
31
| 1 | 2 | » Stats |
Members: 50,137
Threads: 82,298
Posts: 852,931
Top Poster: glsammy (15,069) | | Welcome to our newest member, timbo5 | |  | 
14-10-2008, 11:46 PM
|  | Member of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Nov 2007 Location: North London
Posts: 388
| | | Hygrocybe and Unknown (yet) OK, these ones are pictures my Mum sent me of some fungi they found in Shetland. The orange one I would say definitely Hygrocybe and probably coccinea. The other one not sure - could it be a Lactarius? Have asked her to damage the gills a bit and see what happens so watch this space. | 
15-10-2008, 09:46 AM
| | Officer of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Jul 2008 Location: NW London
Posts: 802
| | | Re: Hygrocybe and Unknown (yet) Quote:
Originally Posted by Morchella | Hi MOrchella,
The big grey one is Clitocybe nebularis the little red one as you say is most probably H. coccinea.
Andy | 
15-10-2008, 10:53 PM
|  | Member of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Nov 2007 Location: North London
Posts: 388
| | | Re: Hygrocybe and Unknown (yet) Thanks Andy,
I went and discounted Clitocybe because I think I've only ever seen big ones where the cap has already taken up its distinctive funnel shape. Now I've looked in the A to Z I can see the pic there looks very similar. Store to memory!
Just one thing, the habitat description in Rogers says deciduous or coniferous woods and that's certainly where I've found them in the past. I will have to wait until tomorrow to find out where they found it but a wood seems unlikely - maybe another case of dwarf willow or something.
Morchella | 
16-10-2008, 07:00 AM
| | Officer of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Jul 2008 Location: NW London
Posts: 802
| | | Re: Hygrocybe and Unknown (yet) Quote:
Originally Posted by Morchella Thanks Andy,
I went and discounted Clitocybe because I think I've only ever seen big ones where the cap has already taken up its distinctive funnel shape. Now I've looked in the A to Z I can see the pic there looks very similar. Store to memory!
Just one thing, the habitat description in Rogers says deciduous or coniferous woods and that's certainly where I've found them in the past. I will have to wait until tomorrow to find out where they found it but a wood seems unlikely - maybe another case of dwarf willow or something.
Morchella  | Hi Morchella, C. nebularis is very common, especially in woodland, though I should imagine they are not restricted to this habitat. They aren't mycorrhizal as far as I know, so are therefore not reliant on trees in receiving nutrients, its a saprobic species, breaking down dead matter.
Andy |  | | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | | | | 16 members and 439 guests | | Columbarius, GTH, jaguarondi, Jim Ford, k4t3, Kenneth Baldwin, Ladywell, nikolai_avenger, Podgod, pressld2, Rambling Rob, reefbirder, rinabean, Scubi, spaldingd, thunder | » New Wildlife Posts | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | » New Environment Posts | | | | | | | | | » New Activity Posts | | | | | | | | | » New Community Posts | | | | | | | | | |