| | S | M | T | W | T | F | S | | 29 | 30 |
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
| |
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
| |
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
| |
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
| |
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
31
| 1 | 2 |  » Stats |
Members: 50,137
Threads: 82,298
Posts: 852,931
Top Poster: glsammy (15,069)
| | Welcome to our newest member, timbo5 | |  | 
11-10-2008, 03:02 PM
|  | Member of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Oct 2008 Location: Hastings, East Sussex
Posts: 374
| | | Yellow bolette type ID
Came across the following this morning. Not one before but it looks like it could be Suillus granulatus. It's a bit ropey but I've not seen one with the pores that colour before (only my second year of hunting).   |
11-10-2008, 05:18 PM
| | Officer of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Jul 2008 Location: NW London
Posts: 802
| | | Re: Yellow bolette type ID
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike Jackson  Came across the following this morning. Not one before but it looks like it could be Suillus granulatus. It's a bit ropey but I've not seen one with the pores that colour before (only my second year of hunting). | Hello Mike,
I think you might be right there with S. granulatus. Were there any tiny dots at the stipe apex? Otherwise it could be S. grevillei var. badia what trees were about. Scots Pine or Larch? This would help with ID.
Andy  |
12-10-2008, 06:49 AM
| | Member of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Oct 2008 Location: Hastings, East Sussex
Posts: 374
| | | Re: Yellow bolette type ID
No spots that I could see but it was in very poor condition. It was alongside a section of fairly newly planted deciduous woodland but there was pine on the other side of the ride.
Mike |
12-10-2008, 07:24 AM
| | Officer of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Jul 2008 Location: NW London
Posts: 802
| | | Re: Yellow bolette type ID
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike Jackson No spots that I could see but it was in very poor condition. It was alongside a section of fairly newly planted deciduous woodland but there was pine on the other side of the ride.
Mike | It would have been with the Conifer Mike, it's actually associated with it through mutual symbiosis. If it was Pine and not larch then it is most likely to be S. granulatus.
Andy | | |
| Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes |  Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
| | |
| | | 20 members and 432 guests | | Columbarius, Dillybythesea, GTH, jaguarondi, Jim Ford, k4t3, Ladywell, nikolai_avenger, Pepsis, Podgod, pressld2, Rambling Rob, reefbirder, rinabean, rogpow, Scubi, shenk1, silverfox4242, spaldingd, thunder | » New Wildlife Posts | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | » New Environment Posts | | | | | | | | | » New Activity Posts | | | | | | | | | » New Community Posts | | | | | | | | | |
