| | S | M | T | W | T | F | S | | 29 | 30 |
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
| |
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
| |
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
| |
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
| |
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
31
| 1 | 2 | » Stats |
Members: 50,141
Threads: 82,304
Posts: 852,998
Top Poster: glsammy (15,069) | | Welcome to our newest member, nippynorman | | 
05-10-2008, 09:07 PM
| | Wild Member | | Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 216
| | | Mycena rosea, Mycena pura or something else? These are very wet and partially eaten, but were very common in a conifer wood. Could they be Mycena rosea or Mycena pura, or are they something completely different?
Thanks | 
05-10-2008, 09:41 PM
|  | Commander of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Nov 2007 Location: York
Posts: 3,314
| | | Re: Mycena rosea, Mycena pura or something else? Quote:
Originally Posted by chrishorak These are very wet and partially eaten, but were very common in a conifer wood. Could they be Mycena rosea or Mycena pura, or are they something completely different?
Thanks | With thick gill like this I would go for pura.
Mal | 
06-10-2008, 06:01 PM
| | Wild Member | | Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 216
| | | Re: Mycena rosea, Mycena pura or something else? Thank you | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | | | | 24 members and 368 guests | | Anomalous, borg, clowder, Fibonacci, GTH, jaguarondi, Jennie, Joel.W, King Edward, Naturenutz, nikolai_avenger, nippynorman, RobinP, Sofija, Stalkball, sunnydale, thewoose, UB4 gardener, wayne h, Weedy, welsh.lensman, welshcameraman, willowjay, Za | » New Wildlife Posts | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | » New Environment Posts | | | | | | | | | » New Activity Posts | | | | | | | | | » New Community Posts | | | | | | | | | |