| | S | M | T | W | T | F | S | | 29 | 30 |
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
| |
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
| |
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
| |
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
| |
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
31
| 1 | 2 | » Stats |
Members: 50,141
Threads: 82,304
Posts: 852,998
Top Poster: glsammy (15,069) | | Welcome to our newest member, nippynorman | |  | 
01-10-2008, 07:58 PM
|  | Wild Member | | Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 172
| | | Cantharellus? It was a lovely fresh day today, sunny (until later on) but cold- not ideal conditions for fungi but many were seen. Shaggy Parasols, Fly Agarics, Russulas, Puffballs, Butter Caps, Blushers, two Chanterelles, a mouldy cep  , Amethyst Deceivers, ordinary Deceivers were amongst those I found. A dead birch tree was sporting a particularly impressive display of Piptopors betulinus, must have been about 30 fruiting bodies covering it.
An interesting (genus formerly known as) Coprinus had popped up in grass under some larch. I would hazard a guess at C. lagopus because of the downy look.
The most interesting find (for me anyway) was a clump of these things. The "gills" are folds like a chanterelle but they look too delicate to be Cantharellus infundibuliformis. Maybe I'm guessing the wrong genus altogether? 
They were growing sheltered in a hollow in the ground under beech, with spruce trees not too far away. | 
01-10-2008, 09:05 PM
| | Officer of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Jul 2008 Location: NW London
Posts: 802
| | | Re: Cantharellus? Quote:
Originally Posted by Nick_in_Scotland It was a lovely fresh day today, sunny (until later on) but cold- not ideal conditions for fungi but many were seen. Shaggy Parasols, Fly Agarics, Russulas, Puffballs, Butter Caps, Blushers, two Chanterelles, a mouldy cep  , Amethyst Deceivers, ordinary Deceivers were amongst those I found. A dead birch tree was sporting a particularly impressive display of Piptopors betulinus, must have been about 30 fruiting bodies covering it.
An interesting (genus formerly known as) Coprinus had popped up in grass under some larch. I would hazard a guess at C. lagopus because of the downy look.
The most interesting find (for me anyway) was a clump of these things. The "gills" are folds like a chanterelle but they look too delicate to be Cantharellus infundibuliformis. Maybe I'm guessing the wrong genus altogether? 
They were growing sheltered in a hollow in the ground under beech, with spruce trees not too far away. | Hi,
Not sure about your Coprinellus being Lagopus but your second picture is definitely of Cantharellus tubaeformis.
Andy | 
02-10-2008, 07:27 AM
|  | Wild Member | | Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 172
| | | Re: Cantharellus? Quote:
Originally Posted by Andy Overall Hi,
Not sure about your Coprinellus being Lagopus but your second picture is definitely of Cantharellus tubaeformis. | Thanks Andy, I see that Cantharellus tubaeformis is another name for C. infundibuliformis. I wonder if these ones have atypical stems because, although the cap and gills match pictures in my books, the stems of my ones look a bit too perfect and not irregular and Chanterelle-like.
Nick. |  | | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | | | | 25 members and 358 guests | | Ace, Action_Man, borg, clowder, Fibonacci, GTH, jaguarondi, Jennie, Naturenutz, nikolai_avenger, nippynorman, Pete Collins, Richard Baber, RobinP, Sofija, Stalkball, sunnydale, sweedie, thewoose, UB4 gardener, wayne h, Weedy, welsh.lensman, willowjay, Za | » New Wildlife Posts | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | » New Environment Posts | | | | | | | | | » New Activity Posts | | | | | | | | | » New Community Posts | | | | | | | | | |