| | S | M | T | W | T | F | S | | 29 | 30 |
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
| |
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
| |
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
| |
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
| |
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
31
| 1 | 2 | » Stats |
Members: 50,141
Threads: 82,304
Posts: 852,997
Top Poster: glsammy (15,069) | | Welcome to our newest member, nippynorman | |  | | 
27-09-2008, 04:10 PM
|  | Commander of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Apr 2008 Location: South Coast
Posts: 1,750
| | | boletus??? I.D required please What might these be folk???
Boletus??
1.
2.
3. Not a boletus im sure of that but what is it? It was found growing next to a fly agaric in the grass under a cherry tree....
4. Im inclined to suspect this as a Blusher - Amanita Rubescens (alba??)my only doubt though is the mushroom cap was white with just a pinkish tint?? | 
27-09-2008, 06:09 PM
|  | Commander of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Aug 2008 Location: Preston in NW
Posts: 3,698
| | | Re: boletus??? I.D required please number 3 is an old and faded amethyst deceiver - laccaria amethystea.
number 4 is indeed the blusher.
cam't help with the boletuses though - not that good!   | 
27-09-2008, 06:41 PM
|  | Commander of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Apr 2008 Location: South Coast
Posts: 1,750
| | | Re: boletus??? I.D required please Quote:
Originally Posted by KeenTeen17 number 3 is an old and faded amethyst deceiver - laccaria amethystea.
number 4 is indeed the blusher.
cam't help with the boletuses though - not that good!    | Thank you
Number three isnt an old amethyst deceiver they were more of these growing in clusters, young and old, all the same colour.. but thanks for your imput none the less. Do you think the blusher is of the alba veriety?? I say because it was very pale looking. | 
27-09-2008, 06:54 PM
|  | Knight Commander of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Sep 2006 Location: East Harling, Norfolk
Posts: 8,965
| | | Re: boletus??? I.D required please They look like old Laccaria amethystina to me too, but not in their usual colour form- Yours are dried out due to the hygrophanous nature of the species. The gills are an Amethyst colour and they're spaced widely.
In reality, there's not enough information in the image, or in the post to say exactly what it is, but I agree with KT.
The A. rubescens is just a rather pallid specimen.
Nick | 
27-09-2008, 07:51 PM
|  | Commander of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Apr 2008 Location: South Coast
Posts: 1,750
| | | Re: boletus??? I.D required please Quote:
Originally Posted by NickCantle They look like old Laccaria amethystina to me too, but not in their usual colour form- Yours are dried out due to the hygrophanous nature of the species. The gills are an Amethyst colour and they're spaced widely.
In reality, there's not enough information in the image, or in the post to say exactly what it is, but I agree with KT.
The A. rubescens is just a rather pallid specimen.
Nick | Deciever or not aside, do you know (if &) what those boletus are??
The first was found by a large oak tree the second was next to a silver birch. I noticed on the first one that it was bruisng a black colour - or at least i think it was bruising. | 
27-09-2008, 07:54 PM
|  | Commander of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Aug 2008 Location: Preston in NW
Posts: 3,698
| | | Re: boletus??? I.D required please because of the colours of the pores of number 2 I am guessing boletus luridus. I am probably wrong though. It just looks similar to one I found a while back, | 
27-09-2008, 08:10 PM
|  | Knight Commander of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Sep 2006 Location: East Harling, Norfolk
Posts: 8,965
| | | Re: boletus??? I.D required please Upon sight I'd say B. luridus, but it's just not possible to say with a lack of field and general experience in Boleti. This is where we need Flaxton, because that chap knows his stuff- particularly in the Bolete area. | 
27-09-2008, 08:13 PM
|  | Commander of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Apr 2008 Location: South Coast
Posts: 1,750
| | | Re: boletus??? I.D required please Thanks guys.. | 
27-09-2008, 09:25 PM
|  | Commander of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Nov 2007 Location: York
Posts: 3,314
| | | Re: boletus??? I.D required please What have we got? A Bolete (Xerocomus) with the cap margin projecting beyond yellow tubes which have turned sightly blue. Pores large and angular especially near stipe. Tubes notched to decurrent. Stipe yellow to yellow/brown with red-brownish punctate and somewhat swollen towards the base. So far so good it all points to Xerocomus subtomentosus  But before anyone jumps in and says "no it isn't" from the photo the cap is slightly more red than I would have expected and it doesn't show the tomentose surface well  Both of these may be down to the photo  or just a slightly unusual specimen.
Even with these discrepancies I would still say it is probably subtomentosus.
The second one again getting my excuses in first the photo does not show the detail of the stipe but my best guess would be luridiformis
Mal | 
27-09-2008, 09:40 PM
|  | Commander of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Apr 2008 Location: South Coast
Posts: 1,750
| | | Re: boletus??? I.D required please Quote:
Originally Posted by flaxton What have we got? A Bolete (Xerocomus) with the cap margin projecting beyond yellow tubes which have turned sightly blue. Pores large and angular especially near stipe. Tubes notched to decurrent. Stipe yellow to yellow/brown with red-brownish punctate and somewhat swollen towards the base. So far so good it all points to Xerocomus subtomentosus  But before anyone jumps in and says "no it isn't" from the photo the cap is slightly more red than I would have expected and it doesn't show the tomentose surface well  Both of these may be down to the photo  or just a slightly unusual specimen.
Even with these discrepancies I would still say it is probably subtomentosus.
The second one again getting my excuses in first the photo does not show the detail of the stipe but my best guess would be luridiformis
Mal | Thanks flax.
by the way the cap was that red, i also kept hold of the mushroom though now it is looking a little ruff.... was kept in a bag for hours and is now sat between two sheets of printer paper in multiple pieces - was trying to get a spore print |  | | | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | | | | 30 members and 358 guests | | Ace, Action_Man, borg, Bruce Williams, clowder, david156, Fibonacci, fungi2bwith, gobbiner, GTH, jaguarondi, Jennie, MP, Naturenutz, nippynorman, Pete Collins, Richard Baber, shenk1, Sofija, Stalkball, sunnydale, sweedie, thewoose, UB4 gardener, Vulcan01, wayne h, Weedy, welsh.lensman, willowjay, Za | » New Wildlife Posts | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | » New Environment Posts | | | | | | | | | » New Activity Posts | | | | | | | | | » New Community Posts | | | | | | | | | |