| | S | M | T | W | T | F | S | | 29 | 30 |
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
| |
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
| |
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
| |
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
| |
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
31
| 1 | 2 | » Stats |
Members: 50,141
Threads: 82,304
Posts: 852,997
Top Poster: glsammy (15,069) | | Welcome to our newest member, nippynorman | |  | | 
25-09-2008, 07:42 PM
|  | Officer of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Sep 2006 Location: Dinnington, S Yorks
Posts: 812
| | | Leccinum sp for ID please Little Stones, Anston 25 Sept 2008
Found growing in grass amongst gorse, with Oak and S Birch close by.
Colour change after 15 mins
I can't decide between L. quercinum and L. versipelle as the habitat would suit either sp.
Your comments and observations welcomed
Les
__________________ Leave only footprints, take only pictures | 
25-09-2008, 07:47 PM
|  | Knight Commander of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Sep 2006 Location: East Harling, Norfolk
Posts: 8,965
| | | Re: Leccinum sp for ID please I recently asked about the difference between the two and Mal kindly handed out the answer; Quote: |
Originally Posted by Flaxton Versipelle has dark brown to black scales and a dull orange cap quercinum brown to orange scales and an orange to brick red cap | So going on that, I'd say yours is Leccinum versipelle Les.
What do you think?
Nick | 
25-09-2008, 08:41 PM
|  | Commander of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Nov 2007 Location: York
Posts: 3,314
| | | Re: Leccinum sp for ID please I'd go along with that Nick
Mal | 
25-09-2008, 09:03 PM
|  | Knight Commander of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Sep 2006 Location: East Harling, Norfolk
Posts: 8,965
| | | Re: Leccinum sp for ID please Only because if you didn't, you'd be contradicting yourself  
Only joking Mal, you do know your stuff  I've often wondered about the Leccinum branch, and how certain ones are distinguishable from each other. It must come with experience and lots of reading; Both of which, I enjoy | 
25-09-2008, 09:05 PM
|  | Commander of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Nov 2007 Location: York
Posts: 3,314
| | | Re: Leccinum sp for ID please And the odd workshop
Mal | 
26-09-2008, 06:54 AM
|  | Officer of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Sep 2006 Location: Dinnington, S Yorks
Posts: 812
| | | Re: Leccinum sp for ID please Thanks Nick, (with a little help from Mal    )
I see that I shall have to follow you closely at Clumber, to see if I can pick up any tips.
I have got Duke of York and JennyWrenny organised for Saturday's foray at least.
Les
__________________ Leave only footprints, take only pictures | 
26-09-2008, 07:52 AM
| | Officer of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Jul 2008 Location: NW London
Posts: 802
| | | Re: Leccinum sp for ID please Quote:
Originally Posted by Nettle Runner Little Stones, Anston 25 Sept 2008
Found growing in grass amongst gorse, with Oak and S Birch close by.
Colour change after 15 mins
I can't decide between L. quercinum and L. versipelle as the habitat would suit either sp.
Your comments and observations welcomed
Les | Hi Les,
I think I going to have to disagree with L. versipelle for the top picture, as the scaling looks distinctly red-brown to me, therefore it has to be L. aurantiacum. This name it seems is also up for discussion as L. quercinum seems to be treated as a separate species in some quarters and synonymous with L aurantiacum in others. Its the fungi lottery, this weeks its a Leccinum rollover. Take your choice but L. versipelle it is not.
Andy | 
26-09-2008, 12:16 PM
|  | Knight Commander of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Sep 2006 Location: East Harling, Norfolk
Posts: 8,965
| | | Re: Leccinum sp for ID please | 
26-09-2008, 05:25 PM
|  | Officer of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Dec 2006 Location: South Notts
Posts: 656
| | | Re: Leccinum sp for ID please Quote:
Originally Posted by Andy Overall Hi Les,
Take your choice but L. versipelle it is not.
Andy |
Mmmm, I am no expert but nearly decided to add my half penny's worth this morning. I was going to say not versipelle when I saw the first image. But then, looking at the second image, the stipe look like versipelle! I therefore decided not to post a reply!
I don't know quercinum or it's changes on curring but the darkening shown in the third image is IMO, consistent with versipelle.
Which of the first two images is a more accurate represention of the stipe marking Les?
Richard | 
26-09-2008, 08:17 PM
|  | Officer of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Sep 2006 Location: Dinnington, S Yorks
Posts: 812
| | | Re: Leccinum sp for ID please I have only just started saving my images as RAW / JPEG
The image posted was from the JPEG file
When looking at the RAW images in Lightroom, if I select "as shot" for the WB, then the stipe markings look black. However, if I select "Auto" then the do look to have a warmer colour, but I would not say they were Red/Brown.
But I'm certainly no expert with RAW files or Lightroom.
So I would say that the second image shows the markings better.
Hope that helps
Les
__________________ Leave only footprints, take only pictures |  | | | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | | | | 30 members and 356 guests | | Ace, Action_Man, borg, Bruce Williams, clowder, david156, Fibonacci, fungi2bwith, Gateside, gobbiner, GTH, jaguarondi, Jennie, Kenneth Baldwin, MP, Naturenutz, nippynorman, Pete Collins, Richard Baber, shenk1, Sofija, Stalkball, stevecurtis, sunnydale, sweedie, thewoose, Vulcan01, welsh.lensman, willowjay, Za | » New Wildlife Posts | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | » New Environment Posts | | | | | | | | | » New Activity Posts | | | | | | | | | » New Community Posts | | | | | | | | | |