| | S | M | T | W | T | F | S | | 29 | 30 |
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
| |
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
| |
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
| |
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
| |
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
31
| 1 | 2 |  » Stats |
Members: 50,141
Threads: 82,308
Posts: 853,025
Top Poster: glsammy (15,069)
| | Welcome to our newest member, nippynorman | |  | 
06-08-2008, 03:18 PM
|  | Knight of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: Sheffield
Posts: 8,929
| | | Possible Ascotremella faginea
Nick mentioned in the Gallery that this could well be Ascotremella faginea rather than Neobulgaria pura.
I did mention to Les at the time that it could possibly be the the less common variety, but has we were surrounded with many different species to look at and photograph I didn't put it in the bag ... another  
If you return soon Les, it should be by the Ramaria stricta, just left of the Hymenoscyphus fructigenus and down from the Coprinus disseminatus  
I think it may be a good species for Kew!
John  |
06-08-2008, 10:05 PM
| | Frozen | | Join Date: Jul 2006 Location: Hindhead
Posts: 1,104
| | | Re: Possible Ascotremella faginea
It does not look at all like Neobulgaria pura. At least not ones I have seen. But then again, if I had seen N. pura looking like that, I would have said "That doesn't look like N. pura.". If you see what I mean.
FWIW Ascotremella faginea is described in Jordan. |
06-08-2008, 11:32 PM
| | Knight of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: Sheffield
Posts: 8,929
| | | Re: Possible Ascotremella faginea
Quote:
Originally Posted by Leif  It does not look at all like Neobulgaria pura. At least not ones I have seen. But then again, if I had seen N. pura looking like that, I would have said "That doesn't look like N. pura.". If you see what I mean.
FWIW Ascotremella faginea is described in Jordan. | Hi Leif
I know what you mean, I should have said Neobulgaria pura var foliacea rather than the common 'Beech Jelly Disc' - Neobulgaria pura
Yes, Jordan illustrates a typical dried specimen ... very different to the 'normal wet' species.
Hopefully we can collect the sample for proper ID.
John | | |
| Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes |  Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
| | |
| | | 13 members and 255 guests | | barquar, Douglas, gecko, GuyF, jeremiah, postmanhat, Scubi, solus, The Woodman, thunder, tjhavenith, welsh.lensman, ~T~ | » New Wildlife Posts | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | » New Environment Posts | | | | | | | | | » New Activity Posts | | | | | | | | | » New Community Posts | | | | | | | | | |
