| | S | M | T | W | T | F | S | | 29 | 30 |
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
| |
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
| |
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
| |
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
| |
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
31
| 1 | 2 | » Stats |
Members: 50,141
Threads: 82,308
Posts: 853,022
Top Poster: glsammy (15,069) | | Welcome to our newest member, nippynorman | |  | 
03-04-2008, 01:48 PM
|  | Commander of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: Yateley, Hampshire
Posts: 3,231
| | | Re-verification needed please Doing some editing in the A to Z recently brought the ID of this species into question:
Can any body help verify this as Lenzites betulinus or Trichaptum abietinum
TIA
David | 
03-04-2008, 02:52 PM
|  | Wild Member | | Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: Yorkshire
Posts: 116
| | | Re: Re-verification needed please David;
Despite the purplish edges it looks like Lenzites to me, with those lamellate pores; there is a good pic of Trichaptum abietinum here, quite different underneath from the specimen portrayed:-
<<http://mycologie.catalogne.free.fr/ImagePagePhoto/Trichaptum_abietinum.jpg>>
Cheers, Alan | 
03-04-2008, 03:00 PM
|  | Commander of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: Yateley, Hampshire
Posts: 3,231
| | | Re: Re-verification needed please Thanks for the steer and no doubt all will soon be resolved. I'm still leaning to Lenzites too.
David | 
03-04-2008, 03:18 PM
| | Commander of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,297
| | | Re: Re-verification needed please Yes. I agree. The lamellate hymenium is quite clear in this larger version of the photo...
... which is another justification for having larger photos in the A-Z Gallery.
Ken
PS And I've just checked again in the A-Z and the lamellate hymenium is not at all clear at the scale of the picture in the Gallery, which rather misses one of the characters essential to identifying this species.
Last edited by Fungus Ken; 03-04-2008 at 03:21 PM.
| 
03-04-2008, 03:39 PM
|  | Commander of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: Yateley, Hampshire
Posts: 3,231
| | | Re: Re-verification needed please Quote:
Originally Posted by Fungus Ken Yes. I agree. The lamellate hymenium is quite clear in this larger version of the photo...
... which is another justification for having larger photos in the A-Z Gallery.
Ken
PS And I've just checked again in the A-Z and the lamellate hymenium is not at all clear at the scale of the picture in the Gallery, which rather misses one of the characters essential to identifying this species. | Good point Ken, John has indicated that we can have larger images in the A to Z, and this proves it's highly desirable.
David | 
03-04-2008, 03:55 PM
|  | Commander of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: Yateley, Hampshire
Posts: 3,231
| | | Re: Re-verification needed please Another casualty of the recent A to Z amendment exercise was this one;
Can anyone provide a steer to its true indentity?
David
Last edited by cybershot; 03-04-2008 at 04:03 PM.
| 
03-04-2008, 04:10 PM
|  | Wild Member | | Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: Yorkshire
Posts: 116
| | | Re: Re-verification needed please Ok I'll stick my neck out - it could be a very dry Cortinarius, Telamonia group?
But don't bet the housekeeping on it!
Alan | 
04-04-2008, 12:31 PM
| | Officer of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: Yeovil, Somerset
Posts: 842
| | | Re: Re-verification needed please Quote:
Originally Posted by cybershot Thanks for the steer and no doubt all will soon be resolved. I'm still leaning to Lenzites too.
David |
Hi David - I would agree 100% that this is Lenzites betuilinus !
Nick | 
04-04-2008, 12:35 PM
| | Officer of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: Yeovil, Somerset
Posts: 842
| | | Re: Re-verification needed please Quote:
Originally Posted by cybershot Another casualty of the recent A to Z amendment exercise was this one;
Can anyone provide a steer to its true indentity?
David | I'd go for a Hypholoma species [possibly H. lateritium] - basidiomes go like this when they start to grow, then get starved of moisture hence the growth is retarded and then regain the moisture supply - hence they start to regrow but the hyphae damaged by the 'drought' are not able to function properly, their integrity is lost and they break (hence the splitting of the cap surface !)
Nick |  | | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | | | | 18 members and 261 guests | | britnik, craigdsmith, Douglas, Fibonacci, gecko, Insomniak, jeremiah, Malkie, PicaPica, postmanhat, quickbeam, solus, stickman, The Woodman, tjhavenith, welshcameraman, ~T~ | » New Wildlife Posts | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | » New Environment Posts | | | | | | | | | » New Activity Posts | | | | | | | | | » New Community Posts | | | | | | | | | |