| | S | M | T | W | T | F | S | | 29 | 30 |
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
| |
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
| |
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
| |
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
| |
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
31
| 1 | 2 | » Stats |
Members: 50,139
Threads: 82,299
Posts: 852,948
Top Poster: glsammy (15,069) | | Welcome to our newest member, jo0ls | | 
21-03-2010, 08:46 AM
|  | Officer of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: May 2009 Location: Derby
Posts: 964
| | Re: Sarcoscypha austriaca vs Sarcoscypha coccinea Peter
Oops
Sorry I missed the whole of page 2
so my reply above is now irrelevant
Peter
__________________ The key to understanding fungi is careful observation of macroscopic and microscopic features | 
08-01-2011, 04:38 PM
| | Officer of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 828
| | | Re: Sarcoscypha austriaca vs Sarcoscypha coccinea Forgive me for bringing this thread back to light.
When they talk about expicular hairs, would this be one that is part of the outer covering, or should i be looking for individaul hairs poking through separate from this covering?
This pic was taking with one of those camera mics from Aldi...
I have looked at several recently under the microscope and this camera one, but they don't seem powerfull enough to make out the pores... | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | | | | 35 members and 424 guests | | Ace, aeshna5, briar rose, Cogs, Deb London, Douglas, Durrell, earthdragon64, Elevate29, faz, Geoff F, Graeme Robson, GTH, hels, Insomniak, Kenneth Baldwin, KentYeti, kimmy, Ladywell, Littlesparrow, Malkie, MattPrince, mbaldw, monkey, nannabren, NickCantle, rogpow, Russell Bean, shegar, shenk1, spaldingd, Terry123, the naturelover, Ukwildlifeo, Za | » New Wildlife Posts | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | » New Environment Posts | | | | | | | | | » New Activity Posts | | | | | | | | | » New Community Posts | | | | | | | | | |