| | S | M | T | W | T | F | S | | 29 | 30 |
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
| |
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
| |
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
| |
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
| |
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
31
| 1 | 2 | » Stats |
Members: 50,139
Threads: 82,299
Posts: 852,943
Top Poster: glsammy (15,069) | | Welcome to our newest member, jo0ls | |  | 
12-08-2007, 07:47 PM
|  | Officer of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Sep 2006 Location: Dinnington, S Yorks
Posts: 812
| | | Polyporus ID please Clumber Park (10A) 12 August2007
Found polyporus squamosus growing on a fallen beech branch (correct me if I'm wrong)
Also found on same branch the following specimen. Is it a young version of polyporus squamosus or not?
Your comments and suggestions welcomed
Thanks
Les
__________________ Leave only footprints, take only pictures | 
13-08-2007, 12:22 PM
| | Commander of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,297
| | | Re: Polyporus ID please Judging by the pale yellow-brown cap (lacking large scales) and blackened base of the stem, your second specimen looks like Polyporus varius to me (now Polyporus leptocephalus).
Your first could be Polyporus squamosos, or even Polyporus tuberaster (synonym Polyporus floccipes). Both have scaly caps but supposedly P. squamosus has a blackened base to the stem whereas P. tuberaster does not.
Did you happen to notice if the stem had a blackened base?
Ken | 
13-08-2007, 02:55 PM
|  | Wild Member | | Join Date: Dec 2006 Location: South west Essex.
Posts: 179
| | | Re: Polyporus ID please Judging from the photo's, I would suggest that all three could be Polyporus tuberaster (P.floccipes). This is an inedible fungus, though not poisonous. Hope this helps.
Happy foraging. | 
13-08-2007, 07:01 PM
| | Commander of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,297
| | | Re: Polyporus ID please Polyporus tuberaster has a scaly cap and does not have a blackened base to the stem. The bottom two images are of a different species from the first image and I would put my money on Polyporus varius for the specimen without the scaly cap. This is a very common species.
Ken | 
13-08-2007, 07:20 PM
| | Commander of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,297
| | | Re: Polyporus ID please Quote:
Originally Posted by Fungus Ken Polyporus tuberaster has a scaly cap and does not have a blackened base to the stem. The bottom two images are of a different species from the first image and I would put my money on Polyporus varius for the specimen without the scaly cap. | I'll rephrase this because I'm feigning a confidence I don't really have! Polyporus tuberaster should have a cap with distinctly darker scales and, according to the most up to date monographs on polypores, should not have a blackened base to the stem.
I would be fairly confident that the bottom two images are of a different species from the first image and Polyporus varius would be a reasonable bet for the specimen without the scaly cap. Having said that, P. varius tends to have a very smooth cap and the photos don't seem as smooth as I usually see. (Things are never straightforward with fungi are they?)
But the blackened base for the second specimen should rule out P. tuberaster for this one.
Ken | 
13-08-2007, 07:24 PM
|  | Knight of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: Sheffield
Posts: 8,928
| | | Re: Polyporus ID please Quote:
Originally Posted by Fungus Ken Polyporus tuberaster has a scaly cap and does not have a blackened base to the stem. The bottom two images are of a different species from the first image and I would put my money on Polyporus varius for the specimen without the scaly cap. This is a very common species.
Ken | If these are the samples Les showed me at Clumber they were definately Polyporus varius.
I wasn't certain about the first species to be perfectly honest.
John | 
14-08-2007, 06:40 PM
|  | Officer of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Sep 2006 Location: Dinnington, S Yorks
Posts: 812
| | | Re: Polyporus ID please This is an shot of the base of the first image above.
Neither of the above two sample, which I retained, have shown an blackening at the base of the stem. The second fungi has dried with a slightly darker ring around the outer section of the cap. The cap does feel smooth to the touch.
This is a shot of another Polyporus that I found the day before the above images, but also on the same fallen Beech branch (it was large). There had been another larger specimen above the one in the shot, but it had been eaten, and the remains were on the ground. I thought that this was also Polyporus squamosus, but now have doubts following your commentary.
Les
__________________ Leave only footprints, take only pictures
Last edited by Nettle Runner; 14-08-2007 at 06:52 PM.
Reason: detail added
| 
14-08-2007, 07:00 PM
|  | Officer of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Sep 2006 Location: Dinnington, S Yorks
Posts: 812
| | | Re: Polyporus ID please Correction to the last post (I ran out of time on the edit)
This paragraph to be replaced
Neither of the above two sample, which I retained, have shown an blackening at the base of the stem. The second fungi has dried with a slightly darker ring around the outer section of the cap. The cap does feel smooth to the touch.
with this one
The first fungi, (I retained both samples), does not show an blackening at the base of the stem, only a darkening which I assume is the wood to which it was attached. The second fungi does have a distinct thin black ring at the base (as in the image above) and has dried with a slightly darker ring around the outer section of the cap. The cap does feel smooth to the touch.
Les
__________________ Leave only footprints, take only pictures | 
17-08-2007, 07:07 PM
| | Commander of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,297
| | | Re: Polyporus ID please Your pale, smooth capped specimen, with a blackened base to the stem would seem to be confirmed as Polyporus varius, taking account of John's advice.
I'd say your first scaly specimen was likely to be Polyporus tuberaster because of the lack of any blackening to the base to the stem but I wouldn't be as confident of this just from a photo. Polyporus tuberaster is generally smaller and less robust than Polyporus squamosus, and also much less common, so if you find very large specimens, these will almost certainly be the latter.
As for your third specimen ...  Who knows?
Ken |  | | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | | | | 30 members and 417 guests | | 2dogs2000, Ace, agoutiwolf, Bios, Birdman1976, Bobby2389, briar rose, Cogs, Deb London, Dillybythesea, Durrell, frits_b, Geoff F, glsammy, Ian Gray, k4t3, katio3, Ladywell, Littlesparrow, MegaCindy, RobSutton, rooftop, Sharp Shooter, shenk1, squishy, Sultan, Tursiops2, Ukwildlifeo, Wharfrat, Za | » New Wildlife Posts | | | | | | | | | ID please Today 06:23 PM 10 Replies, 179 Views | | | | | | | » New Environment Posts | | | | | | | | | » New Activity Posts | | | | | | | | | » New Community Posts | | | | | | | | | |