| | S | M | T | W | T | F | S | | 29 | 30 |
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
| |
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
| |
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
| |
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
| |
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
31
| 1 | 2 | » Stats |
Members: 50,142
Threads: 82,311
Posts: 853,029
Top Poster: glsammy (15,069) | | Welcome to our newest member, Posbyonechop | |  | | 
10-02-2010, 06:56 PM
|  | Knight Commander of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: Sheffield, FPRSY
Posts: 7,655
| | | Re: Primordial soup theory has had its time Quote:
Originally Posted by Ukwildlifeo ......., though I have to say Im yet to read a paper on it (not saying there isn't one btw!)
A quick google brings this up Life Falling Back to Earth | Fred Hoyle and Chandra Wickramasinghe came up with that theory and wrote many papers on it, including one in Nature, I think. Summarised here: Life from Space: An Emerging Paradigm (ActionBioscience)
Yet another interesting theory! | 
10-02-2010, 08:55 PM
| | Commander of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,667
| | | Re: Primordial soup theory has had its time I was at University when the 'out of space' hypothesis started gaining wider interest, but it still sounded a bit barmy. But now it is a serious contender. I think it's much less likely that full-formed organisms arrived that way, though. I remember the huge NASA announcement about 10 years ago, that they had found fossil organisms on a Mars sample. That seems to have been quietly swept under the carpet (or can someone update?). | 
11-02-2010, 06:20 AM
|  | Commander of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Jun 2009 Location: SW London
Posts: 2,099
| | | Re: Primordial soup theory has had its time Quote from Newscientist Nov 2009 on this subject... The possibility that the rock contains fossilised microbes received another boost in August when a team led by Paul Niles, also of NASA Johnson, showed that carbon in the meteorite was deposited in balmy water conducive to life, rather than a scorching temperature above 150 °C as had been proposed previously.
__________________ Listen out for meaning, listen out for truth, listen out for life. Listen out for the birds. | 
17-02-2010, 03:39 PM
|  | Knight Commander of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: Romford, Essex
Posts: 5,355
| | | Re: Primordial soup theory has had its time Quote:
Originally Posted by RKB I was at University when the 'out of space' hypothesis started gaining wider interest, but it still sounded a bit barmy. But now it is a serious contender. I think it's much less likely that full-formed organisms arrived that way, though. I remember the huge NASA announcement about 10 years ago, that they had found fossil organisms on a Mars sample. That seems to have been quietly swept under the carpet (or can someone update?). | Yea I think it was proved to be an inorganic mineral deposit so NASA quickly moved on to something else! Still with some of the 'extremophiles' (I love that name) on earth living in hot springs, thermal vents, deep underground, under Ice and various other places not so long ago we though life was impossible, I don't think micro organisms travelling across space, safe in a (large) meteorite is too hard to consider | 
20-02-2010, 02:33 PM
| | Frozen | | Join Date: Dec 2009 Location: Nr Canterbury, Kent
Posts: 1,100
| | | Re: Primordial soup theory has had its time Hi Hobjob. I'm curious. If Earth's atmophere wasn't lrgely methane, what was it? Just nitrogen and CO2 or are you suggesting oxygen was there all along? |  | | | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | | » New Wildlife Posts | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | » New Environment Posts | | | | | | | | | » New Activity Posts | | | | | | | | | » New Community Posts | | | Spammers! Yesterday 08:00 AM 5 Replies, 99 Views | | | | | |