I'm all for BST in the winter in England, and double summer time in the summer sounds ok to me too. Both would certainly reduce my energy use. By the way, the Scots make up approx 8.5% of the UK population, England approx 84%.
This link is a good summary of the whole debate:
http://www.parliament.uk/commons/lib...snsc-03796.pdf
It was interesting how a great deal was made of darker mornings and an increased risk to children's safety in the mornings at the time of the 1968-71 experiment, which seemed to have an undue influence on the poll about keeping GMT. That accidents were significantly reduced overall seemed to be ignored or not understood by the public/press.
In the discussion about the Energy Saving (Daylight) Bill 2006 the following was noted:
"4.4
Agriculture
There is concern that adoption of SDST may impact on farmers who have to get up early in the morning to perform routine tasks, such as the milking of cows in time to catch the milk lorry. Under SDST these may have to be performed in darkness.
However a spokesperson for the NFU announced, following the First Reading of the Energy Saving (Daylight) Bill 2006, that:
"The benefit of an extra hour of morning daylight for farmers is no longer really an issue - before modern-day machinery and lighting, daylight was crucial, but now farmers have the technology to deal with it.""