| | S | M | T | W | T | F | S | | 29 | 30 |
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
| |
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
| |
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
| |
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
| |
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
31
| 1 | 2 | » Stats |
Members: 50,141
Threads: 82,304
Posts: 853,003
Top Poster: glsammy (15,069) | | Welcome to our newest member, nippynorman | |  | | 
20-09-2007, 01:14 PM
|  | Commander of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Jun 2005 Location: Cambridgeshire
Posts: 3,239
| | | Re: Imperial measurements Quote:
Originally Posted by zharca Hi, one of the really important points about the old imperial system was that it had been worked out to do just that. The numbers might appear odd, but they were carefully chosen so that sums like "320 for a pound, how much each*" came out at a coin value.
With pounds, shillings and pence a pound could be divided by 2,3,4,5,6,8,10,12 and multiples of that, like 30 and 80, right up to 960.
Same with lb and oz. If you had an archaic "stone" or "hundredweight" of something it could divide by 2,3,4,6,7,8,10,12,14,16,32 etc.
Strangely, though the measures that gave us the "dozen" have died, stuff still gets packed in 12s. Try this down Tesco: Buns are 12 for 50p. But I only want seven. Change from £1 please? Grandad could have done it in his head.
*three of the little round ones with a wren on | * or one slightly larger one with a ship on and a little one with a wren on.
wildone
__________________ A poor life this if, full of care, We have no time to stand and stare.
W.H.Davies | 
20-09-2007, 01:20 PM
|  | Commander of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Jun 2005 Location: Cambridgeshire
Posts: 3,239
| | | Re: Imperial measurements Quote:
Originally Posted by Paul mabbott As Keith suggested - I've seldom got past the gallon .... not reached the firkin, ..... or don't remember doing so ...  | Paul a firkin is a take home size. Just right for the weekend
__________________ A poor life this if, full of care, We have no time to stand and stare.
W.H.Davies | 
20-09-2007, 02:09 PM
|  | Commander of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Jul 2006 Location: Willingham, Cambs
Posts: 1,997
| | | Re: Imperial measurements I have only just encountered this thread.
I am an old geezer.
Where I know that Imperial and the other system are available, I always use Imperial. Other than those who say otherwise on this thread, I do not know of anyone who does otherwise - probably all my acquaintances are also old geezers. I am forced into using the other system when buying wine or spirits. I note the point about comparitive prices used in super markets but Imperial would serve equally as well- especially if standard comparisons were used throughout.
In my idealistic younger days, I was all for the Euro and common systems, but it seems to me that we always get shafted and are the only ones who play by the rules - and pay for it. Straying from the subject but going to that on another thread - wind turbines; on a recent coach trip to Italy and back, it seemed to me that we had more wind turbines in Cambridgeshire than the rest of Europe together.
I feel better now
Colin
PS I do not belong to UKIP, etc but am just a grumpy old man | 
20-09-2007, 02:24 PM
| | Frozen | | Join Date: Apr 2007 Location: The sunny West Midlands.
Posts: 1,125
| | | Re: Imperial measurements For those of us who are still stuck in the days when milk was thrupence a loaf, here's a useful conversion site. Measurement Units Conversion
I put this on because it refers to 'American system'. And a point not mentioned yet, is the fact that the 'Land of the free' has not gone decimal.
Whilst we go deeper and deeper into Europe, the US of A has gone deeper and deeper into space and is probably going to Mars. If our Astronauts join them they'll probably have to learn about feet and inches again.
Keith. | 
20-09-2007, 02:25 PM
|  | Moderator | | Join Date: Apr 2007 Location: Belvedere, Kent
Posts: 10,029
| | | Re: Imperial measurements Quote:
Originally Posted by colincurry but it seems to me that we always get shafted and are the only ones who play by the rules - and pay for it. | Hear, hear!
The British are always being singled out as "bad Europeans" because we complain about the latest bunch of daft directives while doing our best to toe the line, whereas most other countries just quietly ignore them. Britain has one of the best records of any European nation for enshrining EU directives in national law - way better than either France or Germany.
Dave P.
(another grumpy old man  )
__________________ (a.k.a. "Horizontal Dave")
"A good man is hard to find, especially if he's hiding. In a field. With combat fatigues and a false beard." - Wilson Dixon | 
25-09-2007, 06:11 PM
|  | Knight Grand Cross of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Feb 2006 Location: i'm right here
Posts: 11,154
| | | Re: Imperial measurements am i right in assuming that the measurements are called imperial because they were used accros the british empire ? - not old enough to remeber that myself  - and if so has europe always been metric or was this introduced at some point ? and if so what was used there before that ?
__________________ Some people are like slinkies, good for nowt, but they make you smile when pushed down stairs | 
25-09-2007, 06:39 PM
| | Commander of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: Lancashire
Posts: 3,464
| | | Re: Imperial measurements Quote:
Originally Posted by kshotton45 For those of us who are still stuck in the days when milk was thrupence a loaf, here's a useful conversion site. Measurement Units Conversion
Keith. | Useful site, I may need it in the future  . Thanks  . | 
25-09-2007, 07:04 PM
|  | Knight Commander of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: Sheffield, FPRSY
Posts: 7,655
| | | Re: Imperial measurements Well the size of a standard bottle of wine (75 cls = cubic millimetres) hasn't changed although now it's quite common to have litre or larger bottles as well.
Your point: if standard comparisons were used is a good one but the shops do not use standard comparisons and therefore we are forced to do the workings in our heads - much easier to shift the decimal point or add/take off zeros than to divide by fourteen, or sixteen or whatever .... Quote:
Originally Posted by colincurry I am forced into using the other system when buying wine or spirits. I note the point about comparitive prices used in super markets but Imperial would serve equally as well- especially if standard comparisons were used throughout.
Colin
PS I do not belong to UKIP, etc but am just a grumpy old man | |  | | | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | | | | 29 members and 358 guests | | afcsupporter, Antsinmypants, bran goesgoch, britnik, chattycaff, cooie, Douglas, DRB, Fibonacci, glsammy, Jackaroo, Jennie, Jim Ford, jo0ls, little_auk11, MattPrince, Naturenutz, neilos66, RestlessLegsMan, rmc, Russell Bean, Sofija, squishy, stevecurtis, The Woodman, welsh.lensman, welshcameraman, Za, ~T~ | » New Wildlife Posts | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | » New Environment Posts | | | | | | | | | » New Activity Posts | | | | | | | | | » New Community Posts | | | | | | | | | |