| | S | M | T | W | T | F | S | | 29 | 30 | 31 |
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
| |
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
| |
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
| |
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
| |
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
| 1 | 2 | 3 | » Stats |
Members: 48,655
Threads: 78,892
Posts: 821,435
Top Poster: glsammy (14,779) | | Welcome to our newest member, redfrag | |  | | 
25-08-2007, 11:49 PM
|  | Commander of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Jul 2007 Location: Boroughbridge near York - isn't the same as the Dales, but close enough!
Posts: 2,379
| | | Re: British Waterways need a slap ^ Really!!!
Well I for one certainly didn't know that, but I do now, so thanks for the 'heads-up' Graham  I happened across a Kingfishers nest locally a couple of months ago and was keen to take some pic's (from the other side of the bank btw) but they got scared off by the tourists sadly  I hope they found a more suitable place on a quieter stretch further along the river... | 
26-08-2007, 12:27 AM
|  | Member of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Aug 2005 Location: Warwickshire
Posts: 335
| | | Re: British Waterways need a slap I'm pretty sure that they just send along some contractors who in lieu of any further instructions lower the blades to the ground and cut the damn lot. Last year the contractor said they they'd had instructions TO LEAVE a strip all around and NOT to cut all. No instructions this year.
They seem to do this site just before Whitsun and just before the August bank holiday. What riles though is the website: Wildlife Habitats : British Waterways | 
26-08-2007, 09:16 PM
|  | Commander of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,369
| | | Re: British Waterways need a slap Quote:
Originally Posted by glsammy Mindless work is very common. The site where I've seen Spotted Flycatchers has a ditch nearby which has just been cleared, taking with it at least one Kingfisher nest, which I was told had a nesting pair. | Are there any British Waterways employees on WAB? If so bring this to the attention of your management, who appear to have a communication problem at least.
__________________ Don't blow it - good planets are hard to find. | 
27-08-2007, 10:05 AM
|  | Knight Commander of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Jul 2007 Location: Bewdley, Worcestershire
Posts: 5,227
| | | Re: British Waterways need a slap I can't phamom out why meadows can't be left to do there thing what harm is the long grass & flowers doing? If British waterways wan't something to do then theres two fallen trees in Kidderminster beside the canal which haven't been seen to for months | 
29-08-2007, 08:42 AM
|  | Member of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 281
| | | Re: British Waterways need a slap As it's an SSSI you could contact English Nature. A complaint from them should carry some weight. | 
29-08-2007, 06:27 PM
|  | Member of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Aug 2005 Location: Warwickshire
Posts: 335
| | | Re: British Waterways need a slap Unfortunately, or rather fortunately, the SSSI borders this site on 2 sides. I've not had any response from the email I sent last week. I'll email again. | 
06-09-2007, 05:56 PM
| | Active Member | | Join Date: Aug 2006 Location: As the name suggests, in the Chilterns
Posts: 97
| | | Re: British Waterways need a slap I think BW’s environmental credentials are very low and they get away it most of the time because they hide behind their legislation to legitimise environmental destruction under the guise of lawful economic activity. However, in this case they may have a legitimate reason for doing it.
If the reservoir is large enough and the water is above the surrounding ground level it will come under the Reservoirs Act and the panel engineer may have instructed BW to cut the grass so it can be regularly inspected, as dictated by law. It’s so they can see if the earth dam is cracking – remember the dam that nearly collapsed near the M1 a couple of months ago? I’m often having arguments about cutting regimes with reservoir engineers. However, they should try and accommodate the biodiversity of the bank with a sympathetic cutting regime.
If the reservoir is not under the Reservoirs Act then they have no excuse.
If you want to get tough with them (and have a bit of fun), under the Freedom of Information Act ask them to send you all the paperwork they have on the decision to cut the bank so you can assess if you want to report them to the Ombudsman for breaching the British Waterways Act 1995 section 22.
This states: It shall be the duty of the Board, in formulating or considering any proposals relating to their functions—
(a) so far as may be consistent with the purposes of any enactment relating to those functions, so to exercise any power conferred on them with respect to the proposals as to further the conservation and enhancement of natural beauty and the conservation of flora, fauna and geological or physiographical features of special interest; (this includes SSSIs and LNRs)
and
(c) to take into account any effect which the proposals would have on the beauty or amenity of any rural or urban area or on any such flora, fauna, features, buildings, sites or objects.
Therefore, when considering cutting the bank they must consider its effects on any flora and fauna and this consideration must be auditable i.e. they must be able to account for their actions. If they can’t, they can be found guilty of maladministration or negligence. It won’t help this year but they will look at the mowing regime seriously in the future whether it’s a reservoir or not.
Also, why not ask them for a copy of their Code of Practice on Conservation – I’ve never been able to get hold of a copy of it.
Cheers, Chris |  | | | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | | | | 0 members and 167 guests | | No Members online | » New Wildlife Posts | | | | | | | | | | | | | Newts Yesterday 11:03 PM 12 Replies, 1,445 Views | | | » New Environment Posts | | | | | | | | | » New Activity Posts | | | | | | | | | » New Community Posts | | | | | | | | | |