| | S | M | T | W | T | F | S | | 29 | 30 |
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
| |
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
| |
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
| |
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
| |
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
31
| 1 | 2 | » Stats |
Members: 50,139
Threads: 82,301
Posts: 852,961
Top Poster: glsammy (15,069) | | Welcome to our newest member, jo0ls | |  | | 
06-08-2007, 07:55 AM
|  | Administrator and Commander of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Aug 2004 Location: On the Malvern Hills
Posts: 3,907
| | | 3 Second Kettle Tefal have developed a kettle that heats water in 3 seconds  The water in the kettle is passed through a spiral heating system to instantly heat the water without preheating...in only seconds
But the best thing about the 3 second kettle is that they claim that it saves energy by 65%, so it's also good for the environment | 
06-08-2007, 07:59 AM
|  | Commander of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Jul 2007 Location: Derbyshire
Posts: 1,720
| | | Re: 3 Second Kettle  It would have boiled before i'd even get the cups out!!! never mind put the coffee in the cup 
jen xxx | 
06-08-2007, 08:54 AM
| | Active Member | | Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 53
| | | Re: 3 Second Kettle A quick search on this found another forum where someone had done the calculations and found that to raise 250ml of water from 20 degrees to 90 degrees in 3 seconds would require a 28KW power supply. At most a domestic socket can only provide 3Kw so someone somewhere isn't telling the entire truth. It appears that while it might start "boiling" in 3 seconds it won't provide a full cup in three seconds instead it pours it out slowly (or as they described "about as fast as an old man with a prostate problem").
Might save energy though simply because it only heats the amount of water that is delivered but wouldn't save any time and needs to be watched while you use it so you can keep your finger on the dispense button. Of course one could just not overfill a conventional kettle.
Edit - I've just done a few calculations and assuming they haven't rewritten the laws of physics and are being charged typical electricity prices then their claimed savings of about £30 pa (and the kettle costs £60) are equivalent to boiling a full kettle a dozen times a day but only using a couple of cups of water from it. Of course if the kettle is only a third full you will save that £30 pa anyway. | 
06-08-2007, 09:00 AM
|  | Administrator and Commander of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Aug 2004 Location: On the Malvern Hills
Posts: 3,907
| | | Re: 3 Second Kettle I hope the person hasn't got a decimal place wrong, because the kettle is actually 2.8kW
Either he's got it wrong, or Tefal are going to have egg on their face with a kettle that doesn't do what it claims until everyone gets an industrial power supply...I know who I'd put my money on   I think it would certainly have to be more than 3 seconds to actually fill 250ml as that's quite a fast flow rate.
The video on the tefal page shows it probably wouldn't fill in 3 seconds, but it's not exactly just dribbling out either. Tefal QuickCup
I actually need a kettle, so I might go and get one of these tomorrow and plug it into an energy meter to run some realworld tests  | 
06-08-2007, 09:05 AM
| | Frozen | | Join Date: Apr 2007 Location: The sunny West Midlands.
Posts: 1,125
| | | Re: 3 Second Kettle On the BBC news this morning they said that the water never reaches boiling point.
I suppose that this would be O.K for coffee but not tea.
Keith. | 
06-08-2007, 09:27 AM
|  | Administrator and Commander of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Aug 2004 Location: On the Malvern Hills
Posts: 3,907
| | | Re: 3 Second Kettle yep, apparently it gets to 90 degrees, but do we need to boil water for tea anyway? I usually let the kettle boil, then pour 20/30 seconds later when it's probably dropped to 90 degrees. | 
06-08-2007, 09:58 AM
| | Active Member | | Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 53
| | | Re: 3 Second Kettle Warning - calculations ahead
To raise 1ml of water 1 degree C requires 1 calorie
1 calorie = 4.2 Joule (ish!)
1 watt = 1 J/s
so to heat a cup of water from 20 degrees to 90 degrees requires 250 ml * 70 calorie/ml * 4 J/calorie ~ 70 000 Joules To do that in three seconds 70 kJ / 3 s ~ 23.3 Kw ! Or the other way around to do that with a three Kw supply would require about 23 seconds. | 
06-08-2007, 10:53 AM
|  | Administrator and Commander of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Aug 2004 Location: On the Malvern Hills
Posts: 3,907
| | | Re: 3 Second Kettle I'd go with that, but Tefal obviously have the opportunity to work from different cold water temperature, size of cup and hot water temperature. 23 seconds is still pretty fast, but I think my old 'millenium' kettle used to do a litre in one and half minutes, so about the same speed.
I was thinking of buying one, but then I saw how much replacement Claris filters cost | 
06-08-2007, 04:14 PM
| | Active Member | | Join Date: Aug 2007 Location: Caernarfon, North Wales
Posts: 95
| | | Re: 3 Second Kettle A while ago, someone said to me that it was more efficient to use a microwave to make a cuppa coffee. You'd heat only the amount of water you require.
Then, a while before that at one of the Christmas Lectures (DVDs were the size of LPs?), I think he was director at EMI research or something, where there was mention of using radio waves for cooking. | 
07-08-2007, 12:52 PM
|  | Knight Grand Cross of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Feb 2006 Location: i'm right here
Posts: 11,154
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Goosegogs A while ago, someone said to me that it was more efficient to use a microwave to make a cuppa coffee. You'd heat only the amount of water you require.
. | while this is true you would probably find that by heating the water in the cup you had rendered the cup to hot to touch. Quote:
Originally Posted by StuartDH I'd go with that, but Tefal obviously have the opportunity to work from different cold water temperature, size of cup and hot water temperature. 23 seconds is still pretty fast, but I think my old 'millenium' kettle used to do a litre in one and half minutes, so about the same speed.
I was thinking of buying one, but then I saw how much replacement Claris filters cost  | surely the sailient point is that the energy required to raise a given volume of water to boiling point (or 90 degrees) is the same whatever method is used - the energy saving comes about by only boiling the ammount you need which you can do in a bog standard domestic kettle with a little care.
also if you are making multiple cups of tea ( in our office the last tea run was 23 cups) then you want all the water to be hot at the same time - not at half minuite intervals over a nearly 12 minuite period. Quote:
Originally Posted by StuartDH but Tefal obviously have the opportunity to work from different cold water temperature, size of cup and hot water temperature. | but even assuming that the cold water temp was the optimistic end of the room temp definition and was 25 degrees to raise it to 90 degrees in 3 secs with a domestic supply would require a cup size of only 2.85 cc - presumably the kettle is for hobbits or borrowers ???
__________________ Some people are like slinkies, good for nowt, but they make you smile when pushed down stairs |  | | | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | | | | 33 members and 430 guests | | Ace, aeshna5, Anomalous, borg, chattycaff, ChrisJB, darrenm, Deb London, Douglas, faz, Ferret, fox403, Geoff F, Gerel, Gill Catton, Gillboy, Ian Gray, jo0ls, Johnny Redgate, Malkie, MattPrince, mbaldw, mollisia, paulinemiller10, postmanhat, rmc, searcher, SteveA, sweedie, welsh.lensman, Wharfrat, Za | » New Wildlife Posts | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | » New Environment Posts | | | | | | | | | » New Activity Posts | | | | | | | | | » New Community Posts | | | | | | | | | |