| | S | M | T | W | T | F | S | | 29 | 30 |
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
| |
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
| |
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
| |
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
| |
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
31
| 1 | 2 | » Stats |
Members: 50,128
Threads: 82,282
Posts: 852,778
Top Poster: glsammy (15,069) | | Welcome to our newest member, Dan_R | |  | | 
27-04-2011, 05:52 AM
|  | Commander of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 1,546
| | | Pipit ID Im suspecting Meadow Pipit, but it was making subtle calls that made me wonder if it might be a Tree Pipit???
PS Snail ID required too | 
27-04-2011, 07:03 AM
|  | Commander of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Nov 2010 Location: Hayes, Middlesex
Posts: 3,712
| | | Re: Pipit ID Before opening the pic full size I would've said Meadow Pipit.... after opening I would still say Meadow Pipit
Can't help with the snail, maybe Slow Reddish-brown Snail?
EDIT: Although looking at the flanks they look good for Tree...hmmmm...I think i'll stick with Meadow though
Nige
Last edited by htcdude; 27-04-2011 at 07:08 AM.
| 
27-04-2011, 07:08 AM
|  | Commander of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Apr 2010 Location: devon
Posts: 2,173
| | | Re: Pipit ID tree pipit for me and The Dark Lipped Banded Snail (Cepaea nemoralis)
__________________ Im at 2 with nature !!! | 
27-04-2011, 07:09 AM
|  | Commander of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Nov 2010 Location: Hayes, Middlesex
Posts: 3,712
| | | Re: Pipit ID The more I'm looking at it the more I'm convincing myself it's a Tree too | 
27-04-2011, 08:01 AM
|  | Commander of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 1,546
| | | Re: Pipit ID Ty for the replies so far (Faz you made me laugh with the snail ID you clever clogs  ) Here is a pic of it from the back as I think this might help ID it better. | 
27-04-2011, 08:10 AM
|  | Commander of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Nov 2010 Location: Hayes, Middlesex
Posts: 3,712
| | | Re: Pipit ID That pic gives a better view of the bill which looks like it fits with the Tree Pipit, also I'm convinced by the flanks that it's a Tree
Nige | 
27-04-2011, 08:17 AM
|  | Commander of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Apr 2010 Location: devon
Posts: 2,173
| | | Re: Pipit ID Quote:
Originally Posted by FUDGEY Ty for the replies so far (Faz you made me laugh with the snail ID you clever clogs  ) Here is a pic of it from the back as I think this might help ID it better.  | well at least i made some smile lol
__________________ Im at 2 with nature !!! | 
27-04-2011, 02:22 PM
|  | Commander of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Mar 2009 Location: London/ Essex/ Herts border.
Posts: 2,755
| | | Re: Pipit ID I can't really see this a Tree Pipit, and based only on these photos would put this one down as a Meadow.
To me, the bill does not look particularly heavy, the face pattern is too weak, the streaking on the breast not 'neat' enough, the flank streaking slightly too heavy, and the hind claw perhaps a little long - there is overlap in pretty much all of these features though! | 
27-04-2011, 02:35 PM
| | Commander of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,667
| | | Re: Pipit ID The hind claw alone is enough to i.d. it as a Meadow Pipit (it's very long). A quick look at the relatively heavy flank streaking confirms it.
Tree Pipit have a shorter hind claw, and the flank streaks are very fine (barely more than the feather shaft in width).
Last edited by RKB; 27-04-2011 at 02:42 PM.
| 
27-04-2011, 03:16 PM
|  | Commander of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Mar 2009 Location: London/ Essex/ Herts border.
Posts: 2,755
| | | Re: Pipit ID Quote:
Originally Posted by RKB The hind claw alone is enough to i.d. it as a Meadow Pipit (it's very long). A quick look at the relatively heavy flank streaking confirms it.
Tree Pipit have a shorter hind claw, and the flank streaks are very fine (barely more than the feather shaft in width). | Although I agree with you, I'm not convinced that the hind claw alone is enough for an ID - in some photos the hindclaws of Tree Pipits can appear deceptively long. In combination with other features, in particular the relatively heavy flank streaking, Meadow Pipit does become far more likely though. However, as I said, there is some overlap, and one of a pair of Tree Pipits that I saw recently after following up a report was far from convincing as a Tree Pipit based on most plumage features (including the flank streaking) - but there was no doubt when it started singing!
Typical Tree Pipits can be seen here (with hind claws appearing 'fairly' long in the first and third photos - though perhaps not as long as on the subject bird in this thread). |  | | | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | | | | 22 members and 361 guests | | 9th River, Adam Cheeseman, agoutiwolf, Anzu, earthdragon64, gecko, Lancashire Lad, Malthusius, Matt Smith, operanut1972, reefbirder, sebastianbawn, squishy, Super Josh, The Woodman, tigertom, vole-woman, Za | » New Wildlife Posts | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | » New Environment Posts | | | | | | | | | » New Activity Posts | | | | | | | | | » New Community Posts | | | | | | | | | |