| | S | M | T | W | T | F | S | | 29 | 30 |
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
| |
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
| |
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
| |
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
| |
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
31
| 1 | 2 | » Stats |
Members: 50,128
Threads: 82,282
Posts: 852,778
Top Poster: glsammy (15,069) | | Welcome to our newest member, Dan_R | | 
25-04-2011, 04:24 PM
|  | Knight Commander of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: Near Peterborough
Posts: 7,100
| | | Re: monk parakeets may be culled Quote:
Originally Posted by aeshna5 As both species are on General License they can be controlled where they are locally a problem. I guess the main economic reason for the Monk Parakeets is where the nests can cause problems. On farmland should they be a problem they can be legally culled.
I also think it's something of a token gesture. | And presumably only where they are a risk to 'agriculture, human or air safety', can't see how being noisy is a risk to health or safety? Perhaps if their droppings are collecting on a playground or pathway but otherwise?
__________________ ....I love not man the less, but Nature more.... | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | | | | 25 members and 373 guests | | 9th River, Adam Cheeseman, agoutiwolf, Andrew C, Anzu, earthdragon64, gecko, Lancashire Lad, Malthusius, Matt Smith, nodd, reefbirder, sebastianbawn, squishy, Super Josh, The Woodman, thunder, tigertom, vole-woman, Wharfrat, Za | » New Wildlife Posts | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | » New Environment Posts | | | | | | | | | » New Activity Posts | | | | | | | | | » New Community Posts | | | | | | | | | |