| | S | M | T | W | T | F | S | | 29 | 30 |
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
| |
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
| |
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
| |
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
| |
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
31
| 1 | 2 | » Stats |
Members: 50,126
Threads: 82,270
Posts: 852,652
Top Poster: glsammy (15,069) | | Welcome to our newest member, Kathy P | |  | 
12-05-2009, 10:23 PM
|  | Officer of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Aug 2007 Location: West Lancs
Posts: 846
| | | Bird id Always assumed that this old picture was of a Curlew but after close inspection it seems like a Whimbrel, unless it is just a trick of the light 
any help, as always, is much appreciated
Frank
__________________ http://www.flickr.com/photos/sleipnerofasgard/ | 
12-05-2009, 10:26 PM
|  | Knight Commander of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: Scotland/Spain
Posts: 5,611
| | | Re: Bird id I thought it was a Curlew but there isn't much of a curve to the beak
__________________ As you get old three things occur. First your memory goes, and I can't remember the other two... | 
13-05-2009, 04:31 AM
| | Knight Grand Cross of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 13,603
| | | Re: Bird id Quote:
Originally Posted by ron1863 I thought it was a Curlew but there isn't much of a curve to the beak  | You're right Ron; it is a Curlew- head pattern + bill shape are wrong for Whimbrel, though plenty of latter still passing through on migration. |  | | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | | » New Wildlife Posts | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | » New Environment Posts | | | | | | | | | » New Activity Posts | | | | | | | | | » New Community Posts | | | | | | | | | |