| | S | M | T | W | T | F | S | | 29 | 30 | 31 |
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
| |
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
| |
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
| |
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
| |
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
| 1 | 2 | 3 | » Stats |
Members: 48,633
Threads: 78,838
Posts: 820,900
Top Poster: glsammy (14,775) | | Welcome to our newest member, yvonnem | |  | 
09-10-2009, 06:36 AM
|  | Wild Member | | Join Date: Jan 2009 Location: The nicest Channel Island
Posts: 121
| | | NASA crashes into the Moon Is it just me... or is this just vandalism? | 
09-10-2009, 09:07 AM
|  | Member of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Oct 2009 Location: Berks/South Oxon
Posts: 430
| | | Re: NASA crashes into the Moon No more so than all the other junk that NASA has left up there ... or is floating around in Earth orbit  Space is a pretty brutal place though and objects without an atmosphere, like the Moon, are hit by lumps of rock and ice all the time so I doubt a few spacecraft will leave much damage relative to what's gone before | 
09-10-2009, 12:21 PM
|  | Knight Commander of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: Scotland/Spain
Posts: 5,611
| | | Re: NASA crashes into the Moon I heard on the radio that it has something to do with trying to discover if there is or was ever water on the moon
__________________ As you get old three things occur. First your memory goes, and I can't remember the other two... | 
09-10-2009, 12:40 PM
|  | Member of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Oct 2009 Location: Berks/South Oxon
Posts: 430
| | | Re: NASA crashes into the Moon They need to kick up some dust and then analyze the spectrum of light given off and from that they can work out what kind of chemicals were in the dust.
Last edited by ChrisR; 09-10-2009 at 12:42 PM.
| 
09-10-2009, 01:06 PM
| | Commander of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 2,157
| | | Re: NASA crashes into the Moon Quote:
Originally Posted by ron1863 I heard on the radio that it has something to do with trying to discover if there is or was ever water on the moon  | It seems that the impact point is close to where they are planning to build the 'moon-station' and if they can prove the presence of water (ice) then that will help them a great deal.
henrya
__________________ Sometimes ice cream just has to take priority over everything. | 
09-10-2009, 02:35 PM
|  | Wild Member | | Join Date: Dec 2006 Location: Darlington - UK
Posts: 162
| | | Re: NASA crashes into the Moon First reports are that LCROSS was a bit of a 'damp-squib'
No obvious dust plume, or anything else, on the first pictures.
Maybe it was too small, and anything kicked up didn't get up out of the deep shadows in that crater..???
__________________ 54.6N 1.6W
Owner and admin of astronomy forum....www.astrochat.co.uk/forum | 
09-10-2009, 02:52 PM
|  | Officer of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Jul 2006 Location: Deepest Dorset
Posts: 721
| | | Re: NASA crashes into the Moon Quote:
First reports are that LCROSS was a bit of a 'damp-squib'
No obvious dust plume, or anything else, on the first pictures.
Maybe it was too small, and anything kicked up didn't get up out of the deep shadows in that crater..???
| brilliant, i would rather have seen the 10's of millions of dollars spent on water for people living on Earth now | 
09-10-2009, 07:13 PM
| | Member of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 451
| | | Re: NASA crashes into the Moon Water on the moon? Why do I have a niggling doubt as to the reason for an impact at such depth? Surely if water crystals cannot be found at or near the surface, then the cost of transporting the means to recover the reportedly negligible amount from deep below, would far outweigh the effort?
Perhaps its just the nature of man to meddle with things he cannot mend but wants to control/understand. | 
17-10-2009, 10:22 AM
| | Commander of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 3,755
| | | Re: NASA crashes into the Moon I think it missed it's target, and that Richard Branston had something to do with this.
The first thing a tourist would want on going to the moon is a swimming pool, it speaks for itself.
Neil. | 
18-10-2009, 11:49 PM
|  | Commander of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Oct 2008 Location: north Surrey/SW London
Posts: 1,113
| | | Re: NASA crashes into the Moon For those moderately interested the 6-8km wide crash plume has been detected [see www.spaceweather.com] but analysis not yet released
Last edited by nytecam; 18-10-2009 at 11:52 PM.
|  | | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | |
Similar Threads | | Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post | | What's above the moon? | Billy Wobble Dagger | Astronomy Forums | 22 | 05-12-2010 12:51 PM | | Moon | badgerwatcher | Environment Forum | 15 | 01-03-2009 10:07 PM | | Fly me to the Moon | PeterD | Astronomy Forums | 10 | 05-01-2009 12:22 PM | | I'm over the MOON! | The Black Rabbit | British Birds | 25 | 22-01-2008 09:56 AM | | The Moon | Boddie | Wildlife Photography | 3 | 20-10-2006 08:53 PM | | | | 30 members and 288 guests | | artistred66, Astra, Birdman1976, Dogghound, DorsetDunk, Dorts, earthgraham, Farplace, FUDGEY, jaybie, Jim Ford, John B (NTS), Lemars, MattPrince, nursiebernard, phil messenger, Podgod, RaptorMan101, rogpow, Scubi, shenk1, squishy, the naturelover, tigertom, Tormentil, Tringa, waxcap, welsh.lensman, Wood Wanderer, yvonnem | » New Wildlife Posts | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | » New Environment Posts | | | | | | | | | » New Activity Posts | | | | | | | | | » New Community Posts | | | | | | | | | |