| Re: Resizing photos for this site Quote:
Originally Posted by Geoff F That was the advice when I started learning digital editing around 8 years ago; but current thinking tends to suggest that with today's massive image starting sizes it is better to use BiCubic when doing a substantial downsize.
When starting with, say for example, more than 3000 x 2000 pixels and ending up with around 800 x 500 approx it means that a lot of pixels are being discarded.
My photo editing programme (Serif Photo Plus X3) recommends BiCubic (or better) for substantial resizing in either direction; however, I have asked this question on the Cambridge in Colour photo forums site to see what is the general opinion on this subject worldwide.
I will report back. |
okay i stand corrected - but could you explain why ? as its hard to see how interpolation helps when downsizing an image (incidentally when upsizing i generally use "genuine fractals" as imo its marginally better than the photoshop bicubic alogorythm)
__________________ Some people are like slinkies, good for nowt, but they make you smile when pushed down stairs |