Quote:
Originally Posted by kiltoncomp  just a thought, but would being a member of the national trust make the said member part of that "ownership" ?? |
I wouldn't think it would, but even if it did, it would be like enforcing the payment of a levy, to get permission to display photographs of landscapes which are, after all, the national heritage of this country.
I would apply this to the photography of flora & fauna on NT land as well. - They don't plant all the wild flowers, they don't breed & rear all the wildlife that is roaming freely, with the ability to enter & exit their land at will.
Why, therefore, should they think they can have the monopoly on who can and who cannot display photographs of that flora & fauna?
Regards
Mike.