[eeyore]

to an extent this is a storm in a tea cup - although the clause does cover non comercial websites i suspect that has more to do with bad drafting than an evil intent.

One very much doubts that the national trust are going to take legal action against someone for putting a picture of their property on a personal web page let alone against another charity such as wab - it is quite clear that their intent is to stop anyone from making money from images of their property, which is fair enough.

Also Wab doesnt fall under the image libraries clause as someone suggested above because wab isnt an image library in that images here arent sold on for third party use.