| Re: National Trust: photography persecution
The whole thing sounds completely unenforcable to me, why would the National Trust even bother to try?
When it comes to photos of the outdoors its there for all to see so how can image ownership come into it?
Photography of National Trust buildings interiors can probably have more rules set about it as ownership is more proveable.
Sounds like something that no-one should really worry about, and it sounds like a lot of rumours and supposition, until National Trust actually declares anything itself then I'd take it all as a load of guff! |