View Single Post

  #8 (permalink)  
Old 30-04-2009, 06:51 PM
pressld2's Avatar
pressld2 pressld2 is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Belvedere, Kent
Posts: 10,018
Re: 'Upgrade' of lenses, your thoughts appreciated! =]

Hi Nikkilouise, I'm a Nikon user so can't offer an opinion on Canon lenses but I will say that if you're using a shutter speed slow enough that you need IS then it's too slow for birds in flight as you'll get blurring due to subject movement.

I have the Nikon 80-400mm VR lens which is broadly equivalent to the Canon 100-400mm IS. VR is "Vibration Reduction" - the Nikon version of IS - and I very rarely, if ever, switch it on. This thread explains why not: VR (or IS) - Is it worth it?

In your shoes I'd be very tempted to go for the straight 400mm lens and not worry about the IS. Ollie has shown what it can do in a skilled photographer's hands, his in flight shots are some of the best on WAB.

Dave P.
__________________
(a.k.a. "Horizontal Dave")

"A good man is hard to find, especially if he's hiding. In a field. With combat fatigues and a false beard." - Wilson Dixon
Reply With Quote