View Single Post

  #18 (permalink)  
Old 30-06-2008, 09:44 PM
eeyore's Avatar
eeyore eeyore is offline
Knight Grand Cross of the Wild Empire
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: i'm right here
Posts: 11,154
Re: How would you define Macro?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Leif View Post
Eeyore:

I judge Thompson by his photos which IMO are first rate, in part because he has the entomological knowledge. MF film versus 35mm film is a question of taste and I can see where he is coming from. His comment about digital might have been made when digital was in its infancy, and hence it makes sense. If not, then I agree it is a daft statement to make. Still, absurd beliefs or not, his photos are good.

.
I take your point about his photos - they are indeed good , and i'm not bothered what system he uses himself - however writing that in a book entitled "close up and macro a photographers guide" strikes me as both elitist and likely to alienate a lot of amateurs from the discipline which is not a good thing

phd on the other hand yes some of his pictures suck - though a sizable proportion dont - but he does talk a lot of sense about macro on a budget(tubes, close up filters, lense reversal etc) which is more likely to make the beginer think "yes i can do this" than "this is only for experts with expensive kit"
__________________
Some people are like slinkies, good for nowt, but they make you smile when pushed down stairs
Reply With Quote